[MOD] the poster also said
"And for the record I'm just pointing out that if the Isles weren't such a nightmare Barzal would be in the MVP conversation along with Kopitar, Hall, Marchand, etc. That's it. Not saying he should win it."
You chose on your own to disregard his qualifier, [MOD]
and for the record Plus minus while not a great stat is relevant within a team context, When 80% of a team is a negative and a few players are even or even a plus it tells you that they are at least attempting to play responsibly, which is all a coach asks.
[MOD]
If you Even watched Barzal you'd know he gives Maximum effort on a consistent basis, he is the least of the Islanders issues, injuries and lack of experience on defense, and inconsistent Goaltending are the islanders problems, 2 things that Barzal couldnt change if he tried.
[MOD]
[MOD] the premise of if the Isles were having a better season he would be a candidate is also incorrect. Here are forwards only who are having a better statistical season:
Kucherov, Malkin, McDavid, MacKinnon, Giroux, Stamkos, Gaudreau, Kopitar, Kessel, Wheeler, Crosby, Hall, Voracek, Ovechkin, Rantenan, Marchand, Barkov.
Only names on the list that do not have more goals are Wheeler and Voracek. Once you factor in Dman and Goalies were do you think Barzal would rank in MVP voting?
Unless you think 30 players get MVP consideration. I get it, Barzal is the Isles MVP this year which is impressive because they also have Tavares who is a top end player. Of the 17 players listed above how many are going to get serious consideration 5 or 6?
[MOD] are you going to ignore the great seasons that many players are having this season, you can ignore their team success if you like since these guys numbers are currently better.