bumperkisser
Registered User
- Mar 31, 2009
- 13,905
- 1,123
dont know how we're playin but gibbys numbers arent very good tonight. granted its pre-season etc etc. but eh
There's no way to judge how the goalies are doing.dont know how we're playin but gibbys numbers arent very good tonight. granted its pre-season etc etc. but eh
Dark Knight @ShadowOftheBat 5m5 minutes ago
Nattinen 86% and Rakell at 71% on the dots.
That nonsense is no more hockey than a shootout is. It's just a series of breakaway drills.
Wow, no so sure I like that 3 on 3. Couldn't they play 5 minutes 4 on 4 and another 5 3 on 3?
Atleast it's somewhat team oriented....
So what happens when there is a penalty 3-on-3? Does one team get an extra skater instead of one team being down a player?
That's the point. The idea is to make defense next to impossible. But hey, running time = hockey, so the fake purists are appeased.That 3 on 3 sounded like a cluster ****
That nonsense is no more hockey than a shootout is. It's just a series of breakaway drills.
Honestly why the hell would you not start sekac in the 3 on 3
"I thought there were a lot of good things and bad things in the game, and you learn from watching bad things," said Boudreau. "You learn a little bit about players. You would like to come out with a win all the time. Losing in OT... we had a chance to win. We had it on our stick. Overall, I was fairly happy with most of the players."
Sekac, whom Boudreau said “looks bigger, stronger, quicker and more determined to be an everyday player,†used his trademark speed to catch Colorado defensemen flat-footed before sneaking one past Varlamov.
"If you went down the lineup, I thought Wagner, Santorelli, Friberg and Sekac were good, and I thought Rakell was good early," said Boudreau. "I thought Despres had a good game. Theodore logged a lot of minutes. Nick Ritchie was banging the body, going to the net and doing what he was supposed to do. Those are positive signs."