Nothing to base it on except, Babcock is a free agent, Bowman and Babcock are chums and our owner has deep, deep pockets. Really deep.
Yes, I hope he signs here.
You are basing his resigning in Detroit on what? That the team is willing to let him become a free agent? Teams usually resign people they want well before expiration of current deals.
Rocky Wirtz is worth less than half of Mike Ilitch's net worth. Not to mention there is basically no owner that has showed the commitment to monetary spending even if it is to take a loss in Pro Sports over the last two decades. His pockets are deep but outside of Toronto Detroit is still home to the deepest checkbook in the league. They pay their AHL coach NHL wages just to keep him from interviewing. Rumors have it Hakan Andersson is the highest paid scout by a significant amount and that is good because he earned it.
Toronto is the only team that could feasibly offer something so ridiculous Ilitch wouldn't match it. Also if you fire Q to pull off this move you would be paying the former highest paid coach in the league his salary still and then be tripling it just to land Babcock. You can say they are deep but I doubt the Blackhawks ownership to have the third highest part of their budget after Kane and Toews to be the money spent on two coaches for several years.
The other stuff comes off as wild speculation by somebody that wants something badly to happen without putting much thought into it.
First of all is the fact Q is not being fired, they don't have front office jobs open so he would have to want to transition out of hockey all together.
Secondly Mike Babcock has maintained he thinks he works for the best owners in sports and he is immensely happy in Detroit. He likes his boss in Holland and he loves his owners. He said he wasn't re-signing in season, so lack of something coming in season is not surprising.
It is believed he wanted a couple of things though. He sees it reportedly as a duty to get NHL coaches on par or closer to the pay enjoyed in the other major sports. He has a chance to significantly alter the market and likely does see that as an obligation to his coaching brethren.
The other is namely power. More executive control in terms of personnel. Here is the rocky part with the Wings along with they probably are dubious to pay him more than Holland. But in any event this doesn't in Chicago either. You think Stan, Scotty, and McDonough have a lot of interest in forking over their power either? The answer is no, he will not gain more in that setup than he would in Detroit in terms of final say.
The last part is believed he wanted to see the direction of this team. You know the one that swept the Blackhawks this season and has hovered near the top of the standings with guys that won an AHL championship. Under Ilitch ownership they have never been cheap they have been the model of consistency. They have operated as a first class organization to their people for 30+ years.
Babcock might go a lot of places. Though it has been leaking more and more likely that he has seen enough that if the right monetary demands are met he stays. But the Babcock to Chicago thing is fairly ridiculous. You say they will fix their cap problems like that is an easy thing, really it is likely more complicated than that. It also would be him basically campaigning for a job of a guy he deeply respects and calls a friend within the profession.
One spot thrown out for Babcock that also makes no sense in this regard would be St. Louis earlier in the year. He would never betray Hitchcock like that, I seriously doubt he would betray either Julian or Q either.
But go ahead and pine for it, just when you ask for facts, there are plenty that show a heavy lean toward re-signing in Detroit or swinging big at taking massive power in another organization (Toronto, Edmonton) if he does leave. It really harms your Chicago theory.
The darkhorse in this conversation for me would be LA opening up by a Sutter retirement. That one isn't talked about a lot, but again he wouldn't be gaining virtually any management power. We have at least heard hints that Sutter would in fact contemplate retirement to get back to his ranch. Q's health stuff aside, he has shown no inclination and there are very few if any rumors that he wants to walk away from Hockey entirely.
I think this thing is a minor distraction at this point and I really dislike it as somebody that does believe he will eventually reup in Detroit. It really was not necessary and likely harmed them in free agency last year and continues to be a talking point in each town they show up in and especially in Canada. He has earned the right to do what he wants, but if he dilly-dallies around once the summer starts, I move on and go with Blashill. Ilitch, Devellano and Holland have developed the winning culture that is Detroit and not Babcock. Great coach, but this can only go on so long until you have to turn the page as the Detroit Red Wings.