If we're trading Duchene, it has to be perfect. We've got to get a young defenseman that's either top pairing or projects to be in the near future. Anything less would be a total failure.
I don't think anyone is likely to give us that, so I'd just have onto him.
I just watched the video on Avs Tv of Sakic talking about the Holden trade. He said it was to make room for Zadorov and Gelinas. No mention of Bigras though.. Prob looking too much into it but maybe he is the trade bait Sakic is trying to use. Package him with next years 1st and you may be able to land a decent D man.
Def not a Subban but possibly a Hamonic or Trouba...
I just watched the video on Avs Tv of Sakic talking about the Holden trade. He said it was to make room for Zadorov and Gelinas. No mention of Bigras though.. Prob looking too much into it but maybe he is the trade bait Sakic is trying to use. Package him with next years 1st and you may be able to land a decent D man.
Def not a Subban but possibly a Hamonic or Trouba...
IMO it only made sense if we were flipping Barrie for forward help as well and just trying to "change the look" of the team by swapping a core F+D for another core F+D.
If we keep Barrie and trade Duchene it makes no sense. Especially if it is a guy like Trouba who wants as much as Duchene makes anyways. You've completely unbalanced how you've spread the cap around (forwards versus derfense) with a top 4 consisting of 3 guys making $6 million (or even more) plus FB's $4.5. $22.5+ million or over 30% of the cap on 4 defenders for a team that already has shown plenty of trouble getting production out of it's forward group without trading the best one.
With Duchene's success at RW and his seeming to like it there, Avs have no reason to trade him now unless a team comes calling with a significant return.
I would say Duchene is behind Varly and Barrie when it comes to likely core traded. It might have been different early in the 15-16 season, but with the success of the RW experiment after struggling on the wing years ago, I think Duchene is in fine standing.
I just watched the video on Avs Tv of Sakic talking about the Holden trade. He said it was to make room for Zadorov and Gelinas. No mention of Bigras though.. Prob looking too much into it but maybe he is the trade bait Sakic is trying to use. Package him with next years 1st and you may be able to land a decent D man.
Def not a Subban but possibly a Hamonic or Trouba...
With the team we have now, plus a minor signing or two, we should not be trading our 1st next year, let alone Bigras.
Barrie is still slightly possible, but I think any remote chance of moving Varly ended at the draft.
The Canucks had the Mayor of Vancouver show up to meet Lucic as part of their pitch
Agreed, next year's first will (hopefully) be our last chance for a while to pick top ten.
Just keep Duchene on RW, I liked him there better anyway.
I think we'll get a top 10 pick next year and we'll have some cap space to sign a good player or two.
I cant imagine Lucic wants to go back to playing in Vancouver, didnt he have some late night bar trouble there a couple years ago? I mean I know he's like super popular there from his Giants days but he's reaching infamous levels now. He'd never know any kind of peace
I'm guessing he's considering it on some level if he's meeting with them. If I'm an NHL hockey player the last thing I want to do on a beautiful summer day is spend it with Jim Benning.
At least one of our core players will be gone too if this happens.
I'm guessing he's considering it on some level if he's meeting with them. If I'm an NHL hockey player the last thing I want to do on a beautiful summer day is spend it with Jim Benning.
Would anyone be mad if we traded Duchene straight up for McDonagh?
Not in the slightest. It's the type of trade I hope occurs to make our team more rounded.
I agree, and we would save money. McDonagh is paid 3 more years at $4.7M I believe. That's a great contract!