tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
If you want to argue that this is a bottom 3 team then the last damn thing they need to do is go out and sign some UFAs.
Tigervixxen: Because every team, even the worst one's improve every year.
The problem with that is throwing Mr 6 goal Grigs on a top line, negatively impacts tje production output of the real top 6 players.
I'm also concerned for Rantanen, who looked completely out of his depth when given NHL time last season.
If you want to argue that this is a bottom 3 team then the last damn thing they need to do is go out and sign some UFAs.
But that's my argument. Is now the time to do that? How about we sit tight, and think longer term? Ok, everyone wants instant success.
My opinion is we could come 18th - 25th with a few free agents, but that just slows the high end quality attained through the draft.
It's not such a bad thing. Would I have said this after our 3rd overall season 3 years ago? No. I'd have then wanted 1 or 2 pieces added to go to that next level, but no, we lost Stastny, for nothing, and brought in Iginla, who has offered us nothing 5 on 5.
If you think I'm negative now, I won't go into what I thought of the O'Reilly trade.
So for mine, the option is, save the cap space, develop our players where able, get some high end talent through the draft. The other is to acquire free agents, win a few more nothing games, continue to get mid range picks, and stagnate like we have the last 2 years.
We have far too many holes, and far too much lack of talent to go anywhere near a Stanley Cup. If we aren't far away (as we were only 3 years ago), we are having an entirely different conversation.
So, as it stands, we are a bottom quality team. Make the most of it, and grow through the draft and development. Historically we've been garbage there as well, but in my mind, it's the only waybwe go to the next level.
Lol
Mr. 6 goal Grigs was 5th on the team in 5 on 5 points/60. He was ahead Iginla, Soderberg, and Boedker, and basically the same as MacKinnon. This, despite his time working his way up to the top 6 as RL mentioned. I'm not saying he will light the world on fire, but I think you are a little offbase about him.
And Rantanen might have some growing pains, but he'll be fine.
Roy started basically benching him throughout the season as well. End of the day if he is our best (or second best) winger we have, then fair enough.
Also says a lot about our team.
You should probably stop making BS up.Roy started basically benching him throughout the season as well
Given your opinion of Rantanen, Grigorenko and our other prospects, I wonder what players you are talking about developing next year?
And yet we didn't finish last
You should probably stop making BS up.
Exactly those players. Is this a trick question? They need development to be NHL calibre.
On a stacked roster, Rantanen should play (along with Bigras, Zadorov, Grigorenko) in the AHL (I say that assuming the AHL has staff that actually develops talent).
I will be harsh here. They are all getting rushed, because we are garbage as a team. I hate rushing.players. Young talent need time, investment, development, sometimes protecting, patience etc.
Wonder how many of these players make The Penguins line-up, and if so, wpuld they play on the top lines as.people list them here?
You happy with consecutive 21st overall back to back seasons? Fair enough, but I'm not, and want progression (which could take various forms).
Did you even read what you posted? You said he was benched throughout the season. Those stopped around the end of January. He was tougher on him because he knows him more than the other players, but Grigorenko got the hang of it and Roy stopped with the benchings because he was doing everything they asked of him.I beg your pardon, but when asked about his benching and/or demotion, Roy.claimed he wanted more from him.
You should listen to the coach.
Or if you wish it away hard enough, can you make it disappear. Good for you.
Exactly those players. Is this a trick question? They need development to be NHL calibre.
On a stacked roster, Rantanen should play (along with Bigras, Zadorov, Grigorenko) in the AHL (I say that assuming the AHL has staff that actually develops talent).
I will be harsh here. They are all getting rushed, because we are garbage as a team. I hate rushing.players. Young talent need time, investment, development, sometimes protecting, patience etc.
Wonder how many of these players make The Penguins line-up, and if so, wpuld they play on the top lines as.people list them here?
Dater says Radulov too pricey for Avs. At the latest contract demand I'm glad
My question is what happens if he can't get an NHL team to give him what he feels he deserves? Does he crawl back to Russia?
There's no need for him to crawl back to Russia...he'll be suiting up for the Avs in October.
There's no need for him to crawl back to Russia...he'll be suiting up for the Avs in October.
(And yes, despite what Dater has said--even as one of his biggest supporters here--I very much believe in the info I have)
Must be some information you have if you're willing to be that confident despite Dater's comments.
Dater says Radulov too pricey for Avs. At the latest contract demand I'm glad
Exactly those players. Is this a trick question? They need development to be NHL calibre.
On a stacked roster, Rantanen should play (along with Bigras, Zadorov, Grigorenko) in the AHL (I say that assuming the AHL has staff that actually develops talent).
I will be harsh here. They are all getting rushed, because we are garbage as a team. I hate rushing.players. Young talent need time, investment, development, sometimes protecting, patience etc.
Wonder how many of these players make The Penguins line-up, and if so, wpuld they play on the top lines as.people list them here?
Let's see the full tweet first. The question wasn't even about the Avs.