So you think he had positive value ?
No? How is that the conclusion you gained from my question...
Pearson clearly had negative value, which thus means DeSmith doesn't have anywhere near thr value of a 3rd round pick.
So you think he had positive value ?
You looked surprised when the poster you replied to hinted that he had negative value, and that the Habs would have accepted a 5th straight up...No? How is that the conclusion you gained from my question...
Pearson clearly had negative value, which thus means DeSmith doesn't have anywhere near thr value of a 3rd round pick.
You looked surprised when the poster you replied to hinted that he had negative value, and that the Habs would have accepted a 5th straight up...
I mean, Hill was traded for a 4th last year.
With Pearson's injury history, the fact that is hand is known to be at around 80%, and the fact that the Canucks were not cap compliant while the season is about to start, it is pretty evident that with his 3M$+ contract, he was a cap dump...
Why would the Flames do that? Kylington is better than Girar and then you have them adding a former 1st round pick. Yikes.Assume Kylington is healthy (mentally and physically) and Avs could extend him for a few years.
Would Avs fans do Girard for Kylington extended + Vladar + Zary
lmaoWhy would the Flames do that? Kylington is better than Girar and then you have them adding a former 1st round pick. Yikes.
I wonder if they’d take a look at trading for Driedger.
Zary isn’t knocking the cover off the ball as a prospect and Kylington isn’t anywhere near Girard as a player. Kylington didn’t even play last season.Why would the Flames do that? Kylington is better than Girar and then you have them adding a former 1st round pick. Yikes.
Doesn't make sense for either teams.Assume Kylington is healthy (mentally and physically) and Avs could extend him for a few years.
Would Avs fans do Girard for Kylington extended + Vladar + Zary
The Flames wouldn't touch that. Too much, if Kylington healthy.Assume Kylington is healthy (mentally and physically) and Avs could extend him for a few years.
Would Avs fans do Girard for Kylington extended + Vladar + Zary
Why would the Flames do that? Kylington is better than Girard and then you have them adding a former 1st round pick. Yikes.
He isn’t and hasn’t played in a year.The Flames wouldn't touch that. Too much, if Kylington healthy.
So why exactly would anyone be trading for him?He isn’t and hasn’t played in a year.
Hanafin looks very likely to leave as a UFA if not sooner than next July. Tanev and Zadorov will be UFAs after this season. Kylington is AWOL again. Calgary is anything but settled on D after this season. They’ll have huge holes back there to fill.Doesn't make sense for either teams.
Kylington is a big question mark, Vladar costs too much as a backup, and Zary is a decent but not exactly what a cup contender needs. You don't risk a cup contending season and the negotiation leverage the Avs have on Toews for a bunch of question marks.
For Calgary, they're giving up more value and they don't have a huge need for Girard even with Kylington being a question mark. They'll either start selling/re-tool at the TDL if the season doesn't go well, or they'll make the playoffs and re-sign Hanifin and can be patient with Kylington.
I’m not sure if his issue is playing in/for Calgary or if it’s playing hockey period. If the former, then I’m interested. Agents and GMs will know this. Fans won’t.So why exactly would anyone be trading for him?
It has absolutely nothing to do with not wanting to play for Calgary. That is just baseless speculation that you fabricated. There has been zero reports suggesting this is even potentially a reason. So I am guessing you have not followed this at all.Hanafin looks very likely to leave as a UFA if not sooner than next July. Tanev and Zadorov will be UFAs after this season. Kylington is AWOL again. Calgary is anything but settled on D after this season. They’ll have huge holes back there to fill.
So please tell me how adding a cost controlled middle pair defender wouldn’t have some appeal to their GM
I’m not sure if his issue is playing in/for Calgary or if it’s playing hockey period. If the former, then I’m interested. Agents and GMs will know this. Fans won’t.
I have no idea if this guy has the YIPs, if he’s addicted to pain pills, hates Calgary, wants to be a woman… we have no idea why he’s not playing. That’s not any of my business either. But if it’s Calgary or organizational distrust, then moving him to a different situation is appealing as a trade opportunity.
sens would probably have to retain at least $250k to make it work. on top of that forsberg isn't worth $2m either. i guess it depends on how desperate the avs are. can't imagine they would make this trade before goalies start hitting waivers.Ottawa will trade you Forsberg
The poster literally saud "if there are no questions marks on Kylington." So arguing questions marks on him is silly. Avs would take that in a heartbeat and Flames would decline instantly.Doesn't make sense for either teams.
Kylington is a big question mark, Vladar costs too much as a backup, and Zary is a decent but not exactly what a cup contender needs. You don't risk a cup contending season and the negotiation leverage the Avs have on Toews for a bunch of question marks.
For Calgary, they're giving up more value and they don't have a huge need for Girard even with Kylington being a question mark. They'll either start selling/re-tool at the TDL if the season doesn't go well, or they'll make the playoffs and re-sign Hanifin and can be patient with Kylington.
Holy homer hot take.The poster literally saud "if there are no questions marks on Kylington." So arguing questions marks on him is silly. Avs would take that in a heartbeat and Flames would decline instantly.
Healthy Kylington is at worst a side grade to Girard, is cheaper and you get a fairly young 1B goalie. Not to mention the prospect who lead AHL scoring for everyone under 22. Horrible deal for the Flames, excellent for the Avs
So because Kylington hasn't played as many games as Girard you are holding that against him? Take a look at Kylington's most recent season. Not everyone develops on the same curve. Kylington's last season was very comparable to Girard the same season. Why would you compare every year before? How does that even make sense?Holy homer hot take.
Girard is a year younger than Kylinton
416 games / 28 G / 153 A / 181 pts / .435 PPG / 20:42 TOI
Kylington
168 games / 14 G / 33 A / 47 pts / .28 PPG / 15:21 TOI
You think these are equal level players? That’s got to be a joke you’re trying to make.
Vladar makes $2.1mm and saves 89.9% of the shots he faces. That’s whatever. Not amazing.
Zary isn’t going to make your team this year. He’s an older draft year player so about to be 22 this week with zero NHL games on his resume.
A player can pass the physical and mental exams and not be 100%. Drouin is a prime example of that. Plus Kylington hasn’t played for an entire year.The poster literally saud "if there are no questions marks on Kylington." So arguing questions marks on him is silly. Avs would take that in a heartbeat and Flames would decline instantly.
Healthy Kylington is at worst a side grade to Girard, is cheaper and you get a fairly young 1B goalie. Not to mention the prospect who lead AHL scoring for everyone under 22. Horrible deal for the Flames, excellent for the Avs