The biggest negative I see for Ottawa, and an opinion I held at the time, is that neither Duchene nor Turris are cup winning 1C’s. I thought Ottawa was a playoff team, but when you look at cup winning #1 centers of the last 20 years, are any of them at Duchenes level? I can’t think of any off the top of my head. There’s lots of different definitions of what a 1C or 1D is, but to me, the definition is “If this guy is my 1C, and the rest of my team is built solidly, can we win the cup?”. Meaning if you have an average 1D, 1G, and 1W, can this center lead me to a championship. If Duchene is your 1C, you need to have a Nashville-like defence behind him if you want to win the cup. To me that makes him a high end 2C, even if he’s one of the top 31 centers in the league. If you can’t win with him as the 1C unless the rest of the team is absolutely stacked, then what’s the point? It’s a very binary way of looking at a team but it’s what I belive in. It’s also why I always push for us to trade for a 1D like Karlsson. The only team that has recently won a cup with a 1D like EJ is Pittsburgh last year who are obviously outliers due to their centers. If we can’t win with EJ as the 1D, and Makar/Timmins will take many years to become a 1D (if they ever do) then what’s really the point of watching the team in the next 4 years as they don’t have a chance to actually win the whole thing? Obviously I’ll continue to watch I’m certainly not suggesting the avs future is hopeless, it just helps to cement my belief that you need to go big when making these kinds of moves. Ottawa didn’t really need a Duchene, they needed a Tavares. Now maybe one wasn’t available to trade for, so if I was them I’d keep my assets until one is available, which will eventually happen.