Durrr
Registered User
- Sep 11, 2012
- 5,592
- 413
It doesn’t matter how you think contracts should be handed out. There is ample precedent (past and present) for how rfa vs ufa contracts work in the nhl. Not opinions. Facts.
GM’s hold far more leverage over rfa’s than ufa’s. It doesn’t matter that you “don’t like that”. It’s the simple truth. The cba is specifically and intentionally designed that way. To give rfa’s far less leverage. The result has (and still is) that rfa’s get worse contracts than ufa’s.
If you want to lead the rally for changing the cba, then go for it. But Dubas is operating under the CURRENT cba. The one that gives far more leverage to ufa’s.
I'd argue that we already have a GM who is leading that charge, because if you look at the actual roster outside of JT, there isn't a single one of those bloated UFA deals.