To continue on the topic of my Round 1 list from the Top 100 Project—which is far from a finished product—I had Mark Messier at 17th overall, over Mikita, Esposito, Clarke, Trottier, Taylor, Sakic and all the rest. I also had Sprague Cleghorn at 42th overall, over Chelios, Park, Pilote, Clancy, Coffey, Pronger and all the rest. At least I'm putting my money where my mouth is.
I would probably rank Clancy over Cleghorn today though, since I worked on the Ottawa Dynasty project and realized how important Clancy was to the 1923 and 1927 Stanley Cup championships. But I'll work on a Cleghorn bio and I might change my mind again (positively or negatively). Who knows? Less likely I change my mind about Messier though.
Look at Trottier's ppg. I love how I now have to debate a player I used to detest. He always seems to defer to Bossy, but Trottier provided the speed, muscle and possession (with help from Potvin, of course). Bossy made the possession pay off.
I love Bryan Trottier a lot too. It's no insult for a player if I rank Mark Messier over him. Messier did it for longer, that's basically it.
I haven't been convinced by the anti-Messier arguments on here. I saw with my eyeballs and he has the hardware to back it up. The back end of his career should just be cleaned off the counter and thrown in the trash.
Messier brought the goods. The package was delivered and received—in time ! I'm less open to intellectual (statistical) arguments for players I saw play with my own eyes, especially players of Messier's mold.
Though I didn't watch him all the time like @VanIslander who probably never missed a game lol.
I haven't been convinced by the anti-Messier arguments on here. I saw with my eyeballs and he has the hardware to back it up. The back end of his career should just be cleaned off the counter and thrown in the trash.
Oh - didn't know that. Have to defer to VI.
IF he could take his Martinsville-shaped Arena with him...I'd take Nighbor in a 7 game series.
Double-reply.
As for his late-career resume; yeah right? Who cares?! I never understood people wanting to take away from his resume for things he did after age 37. The guy wanted his money after a work well-done. Let the man have it.
To this day I find the Vancouver fanbase silly for this reason (not making generalization, but as a group it's the strongest thing uniting them: Hating on 37+ years old Mark Messier).
IF he could take his Martinsville-shaped Arena with him...
IF he could take his Martinsville-shaped Arena with him...
Nighbor won out west.
So this must have been before my time started here but i was skimming old draft threads and saw somebody once drafted an arena!?!?!
What in the actual ****? I'd vote for that guy just for having the stones to pull that ****. That'd be like me drafting Gordon ****ing Bombay in round 24 here.
Did anyone in the top 100 voting have Nighbor over Morenz? I always viewed Morenz as a clear tier ahead, no? I mean maybe not a big gap, but a tier ahead nonetheless.
From all my research and reading, I can’t recall a single historical opinion ranking Nighbor as the superior player of the two.
Of course I could be missing something. Could it be possible that while Morenz was the “bigger name” and flashier player, Nighbor was quietly the more superior player?
Could it be similar to the Crosby and Ovechkin situation over the years? Ovechkin is the flashier player and to the casual fan may more easily pass the eye test as the “better” player, but those who really follow and study the game knows that it’s without a doubt Sid The Kid.
Could the situation very well have been the same with Morenz and Nighbor?
That pick kind of surprised me.Sorry for the delay, I'll take Russian left winger Anatoli Firsov