I'll think I'll go for the Kootenay Ice. Sounds a little dirty.
A little?
Open hostility? I am a hockey writer. This is what was stated from cottonking.
"Writers suck. You don't know their voice or their face -- just their typewriter."
Damn right I'm going to get hostile. A significant part of my life is devoted to writing about hockey.
Guess what, cottonking? The hockey writer is the one who still has to work the hardest. The hockey writer is the one who is at practice every day. He's the one who, in the case of the daily papers, has to work until very late at night, crafting a story for the next day's paper. The play-by-play guy works hard, don't get me wrong (I don't want mullin all over me for this post). But usually it's the beat reporter for the radio or TV station who covers the practices, and goes into the locker rooms to gather the quotes after the game. (A little different for a guy like mullin, who has to call the game and get the post-game feedback). But the radio and TV people usually just have to get a few quotes, a few sound bytes, or video clips, for the post-game show that night. If you want real insight, real in-depth coverage for the game, the hockey writers are still your best bet.
I knew who the beat writers for the papers in Vancouver were back when I was 10, long before I ever gained an interest in becoming a hockey writer.
Jim Coleman (the man who introduced many a B.C. fan to hockey and sports history), Red Fischer and Milt Dunnell are more than deserving of having their names on our championships.
I had a feeling that was going to offend ... I apologize for that, because it wasn't my intent. I'm not saying Coleman, Fischer and Dunnell aren't deserving, aren't big parts of history, I was just throwing out more radio / TV broadcast names to go along with Lecavalier. If we wanted to go all-broadcast, there are plenty of more great names.
Newspapers and magazines are old media. The internet killed them as a source of "news" ... magazines are evolving / have evolved into a source of critical analysis ... of experts and opinions, not "news." Using a weekly sports magazine to learn about what's happened is woefully slow ... by the time they're in print, more stuff has happened.
Live broadcasts don't have that problem. Mike Heika, Ralph Strangis and Daryl Reaugh all watch the same Stars games ... Strangis gives me the facts immediately, Razor gives me opinions a minute later, then I go and buy a copy of the Dallas Morning News the next day to read Hike's opinion and his accounting-in-retrospect of the facts.
The broadcast is better at conveying the facts -- it's faster. No disputing that.
The problem with the newspaper is that it is not always the best source of "perspective" and "expert analysis" and everything else you'd want in a slower source. Is Heika good? Yeah, generally. But so is [[any number of rival websites]] and so is Stars99Lobo37 and so is GLU.
What makes Heika (or any team's "official beat writer") better? Access I guess ... he goes (or has a guy go) into the locker room ... he gets to interview the players ... he goes to the morning skate. But that's because he has the job of Dallas Stars Beat Writer for the DMN, not because he's the smartest hockey guy in Dallas. That access helps Heika and his paper break a story ... Heika is often "first to prin", but then what? Once the news is out there, Heika's opinion isn't any better than anyone else's just because he's the official beat writer.
20 years ago, the beat writer was the end-all-be-all of sports ... he and the TV news guy WAS opinion. But I like things now ... 10 minutes after Brad Richards is a Dallas Star, there are already 30 posts in the Trade News thread sizing it up from both teams sides.
The obvious problem with the internet is credibility, but that's not unique to the web. When the Stars were paying Bill Guerin $9m a year to do pretty much nothing, our best hockey brain in Dallas -- Bob Sturm on 1310AM The Ticket -- was rarely critical of Guerin's play because Guerin was a regular guest on the show. We don't get a lot of BC Junior Hockey coverage here, but I don't imagine shawnmullin is really vocal in his criticism of the 17-year olds, even on nights they stink. Everybody knows the reasoning and everybody "gets it" ... as long as you have your
Bilros Filter or your
Location: Ontario Filter fully activated, the internet is just as credible IMO.
Obviously writing stick and puck is a desirable service, because otherwise you wouldn't be drawing a salary to do it, but I think the "prestige" of being "the official beat writer" for an NHL team (or any major pro sports team) isn't what it was.
Every great moment in Stars history, TV commentary is part of the soundtrack. I've already forgotten what the Dallas Morning News said the next day, but I will never forget the sound of Ralph Strangis's whiny, nasal voice screaming "The Stars win the Stanley Cup! The Stars win the Stanley Cup!" while Modano and Hull exchanged bear hugs, and, two months prior, while Jeremy Roenick put his jaw back into place, "Derian Hatcher just got his pound of flesh!" TV is right there in the moment, experiencing the emotion right along with the viewers ... when Daryl Reaugh said an OT playoff loss to Vancouver felt like, "a rusty skate boot to the testicles," he was right ... it did ... and in that moment, Razor's commentary was perfect. There's nothing you can write the next morning to match the emotion.