blueadams
Registered User
- May 30, 2011
- 266
- 76
Idk how many times it needs to be said, the Wongs drafted Cossa because of his ceiling. They believe he had a higher ceiling than Wallstedt. Wallstedt may look great now, but has he peaked?
Geez, thanks for talking me off the ledge.Goalies take time. You all need to f-ing relax.
I heard that the were some questions about Wallstedt's commitment in becoming a top tier goalie. Some work ethic issues. Not sure what to make of it.
And this organization has never been burned by that before, so...Someone confirmed (can't remember who) that part of why he dropped is teams were concerned about him maintaining an optimal playing weight.
And this organization has never been burned by that before, so...
Every time I saw a highlight package of Walstedt he never moved. He came out and blocked the angles beautifully but never side to side. He was described as not being athletic. Cossa was, and he IS athletic. He’s also bigger
I call shenanigans. Being smart and in position does not equal poor athleticism. It just equals smart and efficient goaltending.
Here's something for us Wings fans.
Now we don't have to have this debate because someone did it for us!
We're gonna have to be patient with this one, unfortunately. Until both guys are in the NHL, it's really an academic exercise.
I was a vocal Wallstedt guy before the draft and he's done nothing to change my opinion on him as a potential cornerstone player, but Cossa represents an incredible upside as well. If I was picking the safer bet, probably Wallstedt. If I'm picking the guy who can more likely take over games, it's hard to ignore Cossa's frame, athletics, and attitude.
This is the pick that we all may look back on in 10 years. Either it worked okay or it completely derailed the rebuild in a year we could have leapt forward. Definitely a head scratcher this one.
9 W's in a row for Cossa. Single goal in each of the past 3 with an above .950 save %. Edmonton top team in the W. We'll see how he finishes.
Keep in mind Stevie traded up, those picks could have been Lambos and RatyEh, I think Edvinsson busting would have a much bigger impact because he was drafted to give Detroit that 1-2 punch on the back end it hasn't had since the Lidstrom - Rafalski days.
Cossa busting means we wasted a mid 1st in a year we had 2 picks. It's not ideal but it won't be the world ender you think it is. A serviceable goalie can be gotten in free agency every single season.
Keep in mind Stevie traded up, those picks could have been Lambos and Raty
Keep in mind Stevie traded up, those picks could have been Lambos and Raty
Because it is guaranteed that Lambos and Raty are going to be superstars, duh? This is a funny game you can see around here, where people just change the names of those who should have been picked insteadKeep in mind Stevie traded up, those picks could have been Lambos and Raty
I wanted Lambos and Raty before the draft. It was either Lambos or Chayka if Lambos was already gone. Raty was an absolute no brainer in the second round, most of us figured late first at worst.You'll drive yourself insane if you cherry pick the best choices in any draft.
The pick that was traded to move up was earlier than the Leddy pick, so the Wings actually had three chances at Raty but instead traded for Leddy, traded up to take Cossa, and then took Buium. ANY of those picks could have been Raty.Come on. The Raty pick was Leddy. As in, the exact pick that was dealt to NYI was used to select Aatu Raty. Who nosedived from being worth 1OA to the mid second in a year. Pump your brakes on regretting that trade for a second.
Who said they were going to be superstars? All I'm saying is that if Cossa isn't better than Lambos and Raty combined then it's a failed trade. That is what the team gave up to move up. At least those were the two players I wanted pre-draft.Because it is guaranteed that Lambos and Raty are going to be superstars, duh? This is a funny game you can see around here, where people just change the names of those who should have been picked instead
I wanted Lambos and Raty before the draft. It was either Lambos or Chayka if Lambos was already gone. Raty was an absolute no brainer in the second round, most of us figured late first at worst.
The pick that was traded to move up was earlier than the Leddy pick, so the Wings actually had three chances at Raty but instead traded for Leddy, traded up to take Cossa, and then took Buium. ANY of those picks could have been Raty.
Who said they were going to be superstars? All I'm saying is that if Cossa isn't better than Lambos and Raty combined then it's a failed trade.
Here's something for us Wings fans.
Now we don't have to have this debate because someone did it for us!