Out of curiosity I looked up articles on the relative tax burdens, by state. California is not nearly as high in total tax burden as I expected. According to CNBC California had the 10th highest tax burden. Other states with teams with higher burdens were New Jersey (9th), Illinois (8th), Minnesota (5th) and New York (1st)
The 15 US states where taxes take the most out of your paycheck
If we look at Forbes, using 2016 tax rates, the numbers are not that different, with New York still the highest with a composite 12.7% tax rate. California is listed as sixth highest with an 11.0% composite rate. If we go down to North Carolina, listed as having the 19th highest tax burden, the composite rate is 9.8%. What is interesting to me is that these rates are not materially different, so that in my opinion the difference in tax burden by city/state is probably not a significant factor as compared to salary and term of years, the likelihood of team success, other players, coaching staff, and the general living environment.
Tax Burden State By State - pg.1
It is very difficult to find comparisons of total Canadian tax rates by province comparable to the articles on total tax burden by U.S. state. As a result I cannot draw any conclusions on whether the tax burden, by city, in Canada would be a significant factor in any player's decision on whether to accept a contract in those cities. It is also not an apples to apples comparison. In Canada there is a 5% nationwide sales and service tax, which does not exist in the United States, but which impacts the total tax burden on a player. There are provincial sales taxes on top of this 5%, with Quebec having the highest total sales tax in Canada at a combined 15%. Not surprisingly there are voices in both countries that taxes are lower in the other country. But then the services provided by the government in both countries are different.
Canadians may pay more taxes than Americans, but here's what they get for their money