DangleCity
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2016
- 7,184
- 3,380
Brady is tied with or has more SBs than every FRANCHISE. Is there any doubt after tonight who the GOAT is?
Yup. Did not play great, but given the style of game tonight, did enough. Just the fact that he extended drives in a game yhat was so defensive focused was huge. That Rams defense was worn down and tired in the 4th quarter and it was hugeIts not just the wins but also the SB appearances. Brady is the GOAT. Anyone who says otherwise is either a hater or in denial.
That said Brady did not win the SB for the Pats tonight. The defense did. Crazy i know but its the truth
You'd be very surprised.I didn't know it was even a question.
You'd be very surprised.
I mean, sure. There are contrarians and homers everywhere who will say Lemieux, Orr, Maurice Richard, etc. are hockey’s GOAT.
Only real question for me is when it became official.
Montana never lost a SB. Never threw a INT.
Pretty sure if Montana had been in 9 SBs he would've lost a couple in there somewhere.
Just the fact that Brady has been to 9 is impressive enough to me, even if he was only like 4-5 in those games and he's no more a system QB than Montana was either.
Montana never lost a SB. Never threw a INT.
Seriously, Hoyer could have won this SB. Hell, Hoyer/Jimmy G could have won this Rams game behind that Belichick defense.
Playing in an easy division inflates his chances.
The 49ers in their own division had to face the Dome Patrol Saints 2x a year with multiple Pro Bowl linebackers. Contrast that with what Brady faces twice a year. Only road games in Miami seemingly trip him up.
The NFC was a meatgrinder back then. The AFC today is not that.
Plus, in those 4 SB's, they played 3 league MVP QB's and the other was against the #1 scoring defense/#3 total defense.
Jared Goff is not exactly 1984 Dan Marino. Or even '88 Boomer.
But surely those MVP's were only MVP's because they beat up on the sorry AFC, loading their stat sheet?
And if anything, that makes the defensive performance of the 49ers even more impressive, further diminishing Montana's contributions in your mind, surely? Goff had a better ANY/A tonight than Elway against those 49ers teams, by far, and a very similar one to what Marino posted. Did you watch Goff tonight? That's how dominant those 49ers teams were, with or without Montana. System argument doesn't work in his favour, nor does the kicker argument, the teammates argument, the division argument, the conference argument or the silly "no picks in four games" argument.
In 3 of their 4 SB seasons, they were 6, 5 and 3 wins ahead of the second team in their division.
In the Patriots' 6 SB seasons, they were tied once, 4 wins ahead four times, and 3 wins ahead once. An average 3.167 wins ahead, to Montana's 49ers' 3.5.
The AFC has been vastly superior to the NFC since Brady joined the league. But nowhere near the NFC dominance of the 80's and early 90's.
Somebody here in a recent thread has compiled the stats and showed that New England has a better win percentage outside of their division than against it in the Brady and Belichick years.Playing in an easy division inflates his chances.
Montana never lost a SB. Never threw a INT.
You are right. Montana lost before SB.
Brady: 29-10 playoff record (74%)
Montana: 16-7 (69%)
Keep spinning your bull****.
Somebody here in a recent thread has compiled the stats and showed that New England has a better win percentage outside of their division than against it in the Brady and Belichick years.
Montana never lost a SB. Never threw a INT.
Seriously, Hoyer could have won this SB. Hell, Hoyer/Jimmy G could have won this Rams game behind that Belichick defense.