lhsgolf19
Registered User
If Stevie Y is giving him term (4+ years) it means he believes he can be a guy, which is exciting
Who am I to doubt him lol
Who am I to doubt him lol
If Stevie Y is giving him term (4+ years) it means he believes he can be a guy, which is exciting
Who am I to doubt him lol
I think you need to elaborate more. A lot of these seem contradicting. The bolded in particular.Rangers fan rundown on Copp
-Very versatile, can literally play anywhere. He was our 2nd line RW and fit in perfectly
-Doesn’t deke at all
-Jack of all trades master of none
-High IQ player, looks lazy at times
-Floats often, invisible most of the time
-Coach’s player, does everything right, takes no risks. Literally every coach’s dream
-Doesn’t skate with the puck at all
-Pass & go type player
-Concerning injury history
-Produces but makes you wonder how sometimes
-He is not gritty at all. He doesn’t hit or stir shit up
-Good locker room glue guy
-Underrated defensively, needs to be utilized more properly there as in playing PK more often
-Elite positionally
I do wish NYR re-signed him though
Not even. Just because he’s invisible doesn’t mean bad. He makes a lot of small plays that go unnoticed is my point. He doesn’t take any risks, as straightforward as a player can be. Coach’s love thatI think you need to elaborate more. A lot of these seem contradicting. The bolded in particular.
I agree I was confused on those contradictionsI think you need to elaborate more. A lot of these seem contradicting. The bolded in particular.
So it will be around 5 x 5.50 which is about where i thought it would be.My initial thought was it's gonna be 5 x 5.25 to 5 x 5.75. I'm normally off when predicting contracts though.
under the radar / cloaking device vs. invisible.Not even. Just because he’s invisible doesn’t mean bad. He makes a lot of small plays that go unnoticed is my point. He doesn’t take any risks, as straightforward as a player can be. Coach’s love that
Ok. I just think "float" and "invisible" have really bad connotations.Not even. Just because he’s invisible doesn’t mean bad. He makes a lot of small plays that go unnoticed is my point. He doesn’t take any risks, as straightforward as a player can be. Coach’s love that
Some of that assessment kind of makes him sound like a poor man's Johan Franzen. I can live with that as long as he doesn't get a contract like Franzen.Rangers fan rundown on Copp
-Very versatile, can literally play anywhere. He was our 2nd line RW and fit in perfectly
-Doesn’t deke/stick handle at all
-Jack of all trades master of none
-High IQ player, looks lazy at times
-Floats often, invisible most of the time
-Coach’s player, does everything right, takes no risks. Literally every coach’s dream
-Doesn’t skate with the puck at all
-Pass & go type player
-Concerning injury history
-Produces but makes you wonder how sometimes
-He is not gritty at all. He doesn’t hit or stir shit up
-Good locker room glue guy
-Underrated defensively, needs to be utilized more properly there as in playing PK more often
-Elite positionally
I do wish NYR re-signed him though
Why is everything so permanent? If he is the 2c next year that doesn't mean he will be the 2c forever, or even for the duration of his contract.I probably disagree with most of this post. You need to think long term and now just right now. This of course helps right now. Ideally, if he’s your 2c in 3 years you messed up
Somewhere. I hope I’m wrong.
Rangers fan rundown on Copp
-Very versatile, can literally play anywhere. He was our 2nd line RW and fit in perfectly
-Doesn’t deke at all
-Jack of all trades master of none
-High IQ player, looks lazy at times
-Floats often, invisible most of the time
-Coach’s player, does everything right, takes no risks. Literally every coach’s dream
-Doesn’t skate with the puck at all
-Pass & go type player
-Concerning injury history
-Produces but makes you wonder how sometimes
-He is not gritty at all. He doesn’t hit or stir shit up
-Good locker room glue guy
I do wish NYR re-signed him though
He floats and looks lazy in the same way Adam Fox does. Or like Derek Stepan used to. They all are IQ based playersThis post is just one giant contradiction.
Pros: Coach's player, does everything right, very versatile, high IQ, good locker room guy, produces
Cons: Floats often, looks lazy, doesn't skate with puck, not gritty, don't understand how he produces
Summary:
Pro: is good
Con: might not be good