Ginu
Registered User
So wrong in so many ways and the fact you agree with Bergevin is sad. Why should Markov worry about his future until September? The team should have had him signed a long time ago and that's all on Bergevin.
How does Bergevin lose leverage by signing Markov? First of all have Markov been signed like he should have been, Streit would never have been signed. Giving up picks and prospects (from a very shallow prospect pool) is why this team is circling the drain right now. They gave up their best prospect and didn't fill a position of need and instead got an overrated Drouin.
You are living in a dreamworld with a cup of Bergevin Kool-Aid if you think Alzner is a good puck moving dman. That Davidson and Shelmko are more than 3rd paring guys. Having 9 dmen signed does not mean that they are good dmen. Most are average to below average at best.
You won't get a top talent at center with picks and the Habs prospect pool. The team would have to give up something from the lineup which means creating another hole to fill one. And that is without filling the need for a top pairing puck moving dman.
So no, this off season has not been good in any way, shape or form.
You obviously didn't read what I wrote so try again.