jkutswings
hot piss hockey
- Jul 10, 2014
- 11,052
- 8,804
It's all in the context.
Dealing him straight up for a #3/#4 defenseman isn't really solving anything, and would probably be a net loss in the long run.
But if AA were part of a package to land a surefire top pairing defenseman, then that's a smart move. The kid has taken leaps and bounds this year, and it would stink to lose him, but you have to give to get, and a #1/#2 D is both harder to find and a more important need.
Absolutely listen to offers; that costs nothing. But it needs to be a fairly big fish involved to pull the trigger.
Dealing him straight up for a #3/#4 defenseman isn't really solving anything, and would probably be a net loss in the long run.
But if AA were part of a package to land a surefire top pairing defenseman, then that's a smart move. The kid has taken leaps and bounds this year, and it would stink to lose him, but you have to give to get, and a #1/#2 D is both harder to find and a more important need.
Absolutely listen to offers; that costs nothing. But it needs to be a fairly big fish involved to pull the trigger.