Off Sides
Registered User
- Sep 8, 2008
- 9,755
- 5,585
It's not hindsight for everyone, some people who post here were siding in the debate that the youngest prospects should have started in the AHL and stayed there unless injury call-up or post deadline call-up.
Some reasoning was that the Rangers were not likely to be very good anyway, the contract status going forward of two of them could be effected, and that the AHL team possibly would have built chemistry and developed these prospects just fine, maybe the AHL teams even has a really good season and that leads to some sort of confidence building exercise.
Instead now every time one of them has a string of bad games, is demoted, conclusions must be drawn and the AHL team finds itself in the lower middle pack in their standings.
Some reasoning was that the Rangers were not likely to be very good anyway, the contract status going forward of two of them could be effected, and that the AHL team possibly would have built chemistry and developed these prospects just fine, maybe the AHL teams even has a really good season and that leads to some sort of confidence building exercise.
Instead now every time one of them has a string of bad games, is demoted, conclusions must be drawn and the AHL team finds itself in the lower middle pack in their standings.