I diagree obviously. Simple fact is all the salaries in the league go into a pot to determine how that relates to a percentage of HRR. All players put a portion of their salary into escrow each year and if the total pot is over the agreed upon % then all the players pay the difference. What makes the salaries go over the allotted percentage is mainly due to players that have very high salaries that exceed the cap hit. Thus all players have to compensate for it including the poorer ones.
give me a break, you want to compare info of the past month against a full seasons collected info when contrasted against all the other years surrounding it?
What are you talking about. By reducing player share from 57/50, all players are taking a hit. They are doing this in order to keep struggling franchises viable. Why should both the struggling franchises and the rich ones benefit? Your comparison is not valid.
I just want hockey.
Absolutely. Things change drastically in 7 years. It was a simple question - how much has attendance increased so far this season? Should be easy enough to look at attendance figures for this year vs. last year.
Absolutely. Things change drastically in 7 years. It was a simple question - how much has attendance increased so far this season? Should be easy enough to look at attendance figures for this year vs. last year.
Almost at the 4 hour mark and still going.
Are they still meeting have not payed attention for the last 3 hrs?
Almost at the 4 hour mark and still going.
I wish my job worked like that...
Been here almost 4 hours now! Go Me!!!
How 'bout some revenue sharing???
Short Sum:
Reports say its not going well. NHLPA made new proposals on the key issues. Want owners to go from 200m in proposed rev sharing to 260. Also dont want to immediately go down to 50/50, proposed a gradual decrease and eventual 50/50 in yr 3
Almost at the 4 hour mark and still going.
Short Sum:
Reports say its not going well. NHLPA made new proposals on the key issues. Want owners to go from 200m in proposed rev sharing to 260. Also dont want to immediately go down to 50/50, proposed a gradual decrease and eventual 50/50 in yr 3