Toggle sidebar

Proposal: Ana needs 1st line LW

I am I

Registered User
Feb 18, 2010
209
51
mymerlincat said:
Stoner and Bieksa are not trade chips.
Click to expand...

Maybe cow chips? :naughty:

Looking at capfriendly Anaheim would need to shed some salary as well. They have $7.5M to sign Lindhom, Rakell and a add 13th forward.. so salary in and out have to match.

As a Leafs fan I won't mention the obvious ... cause :deadhorse
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
i think the deal anaheim should be taking is pacioretty and beaulieu for lindholm and rakall. their internal cap has them having difficulty signing both of those guys and they have a deep enough crew of defense to make this trade.


they could still run with a defense of fowler - vatanen
beaulieu - bieska
theodore - manson
despres - holzer
 

is the answer jesus

Registered User
Mar 10, 2008
6,597
3,118
Tonawanda, NY
glenbuis said:
i think the deal anaheim should be taking is pacioretty and beaulieu for lindholm and rakall. their internal cap has them having difficulty signing both of those guys and they have a deep enough crew of defense to make this trade.


they could still run with a defense of fowler - vatanen
beaulieu - bieska
theodore - manson
despres - holzer
Click to expand...

That's a terrible trade for Anaheim.
 
Skiffer55

Skiffer55

Logan Stanley's Cup
Jun 4, 2011
1,147
12
Ottawa, ON
glenbuis said:
i think the deal anaheim should be taking is pacioretty and beaulieu for lindholm and rakall. their internal cap has them having difficulty signing both of those guys and they have a deep enough crew of defense to make this trade.


they could still run with a defense of fowler - vatanen
beaulieu - bieska
theodore - manson
despres - holzer
Click to expand...

Absolutely brutal value for the Ducks. Take out Rakell and they still shouldn't do it.
 
Crazy8oooo

Crazy8oooo

Puck Off!
Sep 12, 2010
2,359
1,296
Orange County
glenbuis said:
i think the deal anaheim should be taking is pacioretty and beaulieu for lindholm and rakall. their internal cap has them having difficulty signing both of those guys and they have a deep enough crew of defense to make this trade.


they could still run with a defense of fowler - vatanen
beaulieu - bieska
theodore - manson
despres - holzer
Click to expand...

At this point, who knows what the final results will be with the Ducks' off season...but I can tell you as a Duck fan, I'd not be happy with that trade.
 
lindholmie

lindholmie

Registered User
Feb 22, 2015
1,971
50
glenbuis said:
i think the deal anaheim should be taking is pacioretty and beaulieu for lindholm and rakall. their internal cap has them having difficulty signing both of those guys and they have a deep enough crew of defense to make this trade.


they could still run with a defense of fowler - vatanen
beaulieu - bieska
theodore - manson
despres - holzer
Click to expand...

lol at beaulieu being infront of theodore.
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
never met to insult you folks. would we be close with pacioretty beaulieu and a first for lindholm rakall and a fifth ?
 
Avs44

Avs44

Registered User
May 16, 2011
21,687
10,180
glenbuis said:
never met to insult you folks. would we be close with pacioretty beaulieu and a first for lindholm rakall and a fifth ?
Click to expand...

I think the entire issue here is the premise of moving Lindholm...and I think you're completely missing that point.
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
ManofSteel55 said:
No. Not close. Take out Rakell and Ducks fans still won't like it.

Just try Nick Ritchie there.
Click to expand...

we got to many 3rd 4th liner left shooting types. kinda looking for a right handed shooting guy up front who can take a few draws as well.
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
Avs44 said:
I think the entire issue here is the premise of moving Lindholm...and I think you're completely missing that point.
Click to expand...

im just thinking about that internal cap of yours. if theres one team capable of moving on without lindholm its the ducks.
 
dracom

dracom

Registered User
Dec 22, 2015
13,231
8,940
Vancouver, WA
glenbuis said:
im just thinking about that internal cap of yours. if theres one team capable of moving on without lindholm its the ducks.
Click to expand...

No we're not. Sorry to say, but you have zero knowledge of the Ducks needs or situation. Patches will not return Lindholm, no other meh pieces like picks or prospects will make us trade Lindholm.
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
yeah yous arnt gonna buy that crap. so is there anything that could entice yous to finish the deal as such

pacioretty beaulieu 1st ___?___ for lindholm and rakall
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
ok i give up. tough crew though i must say. perry getzlaf and pacioretty would be the new legion of doom. lol
 
dracom

dracom

Registered User
Dec 22, 2015
13,231
8,940
Vancouver, WA
glenbuis said:
yeah yous arnt gonna buy that crap. so is there anything that could entice yous to finish the deal as such

pacioretty beaulieu 1st ___?___ for lindholm and rakall
Click to expand...

Again, we're not going to give up Lindholm for a few years of an upgraded Rakell, a defensemen that would be behind Fowler, Vats, and Manson on our depth chart, and a bunch of mystery boxes.

glenbuis said:
ok i give up. tough crew though i must say. perry getzlaf and pacioretty would be the new legion of doom. lol
Click to expand...

I love when people say this to strengthen their proposal. Great players together doesn't always work (Kessel and Crosby). Getz and Perry are still great players, but they aren't dominate anymore, and just adding a great forward to that line will not make them some amazing top tier line.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom