There isn't a single guy on the team who you could say is lacking in character/leadership/respect/etc... so no matter what it's going to one of the kind of guys you two are talking about.
This is the NHL, not the NFL. There are very very very few players in the league who you could say definitely shouldn't have a letter. And even further past that, this is the Flyers run by Hextall. He doesn't add players with questionable personalities/character.
Although on the other hand, our captain has been arrested for sexual harassment and assaulting a police officer...
Not that I disagree with you in principal but this is pretty presumptuous.
No one here is in the locker room (except for Johnk + and Myrtetus) so how do we know the lockerroom dynamic?
Its all well and good to mythologize Hextall's team building but this idea of the infallible character and class of NHL players/execs is lame af.
Im sure everyone, even after Dry Island, thought Richards was the perfect person to lead the Flyers. None of us, either here or in LA, was fully cognizant of the things he was dealing with.
To say that the Flyers lockerroom is devoid of questionable character guys simply because the org's PR is squeaky clean seems willfully ignorant of the things that go on behind closed doors and that inevitably effect the team in ways fans could never easily quantify
Im just saying the idea that no one would embarass the franchise is presumptuous.I'm talking about outward facing. As in, all of them are extremely professional when doing anything outside the lockerroom, whether that's interviews, interactions with fans, etc. There isn't a single guy who would embarrass the organization if given a letter. They're all squeaky clean from an outsiders perspective. I don't think that's presumptuous to say.
As far as in the lockerroom, you're right, that's anyone's guess and I've even argued against people trying to assume how guys act behind closed doors. That said, based on appearance and based on quotes from media and other players, it's a very close and likable group. I believe it was MDZ who said many times that this is the closest group of guys he's ever played with. Doesn't make it true, but it's really all we have to go on. I don't believe there has ever been any rumors to the contrary.
Then as for what I said about Hextall, what I mean by that is I can't imagine him ever adding a guy who has had any type of problems with anyone, whether that's issues with coaches, management, teammates, media, or whatever else. Like Kane or Ho-Sang, for example.
Im just saying the idea that no one would embarass the franchise is presumptuous.
You're assuming to know the future.
Richards did everything you could ask of a player while he was here.
Besides some partying stories that trickled out here and there throughout his tenure he was named the captain and for all intents and purposes was one of the best leaders in team history.
No one, casuals or the die-hards on this forum could have anticipated how the front office really viewed him until the day he was traded really.
Nobody on this current team besides Giroux has the track record Richards had prior to that fateful day in 2011.
It presumes a lot to think that everybody on this current team would be an A-plus citizen in perpetuity on the strength of slanted PR fed to us by the team itself.
As a fan it makes me feel good to think our team is an unbreakable brotherhood and all that good stuff and that might be true but as a die-hard, as I assume you are with your thousands of posts, its readily apparent that the PR out front does not equate to behind the scenes reality
Okay... to end this Poll/Thread... Jake won the Poll IIRC... Word is that THIS Season the Players voted for the 'A', which has not been the case in the recent past, and the Results are in:
Okay... to end this Poll/Thread... Jake won the Poll IIRC... Word is that THIS Season the Players voted for the 'A', which has not been the case in the recent past, and the Results are in:
Lmao. That's so dumb
I don't actually give a crap tbh, and it's pretty meaningless aside from it makes it a little more difficult to extricate the leadership group from this team, but they were pretty deep rooted with coach/management already. It's more funny than anything, especially as we thought it'd go to Coots or Jake or someone.
We're not privy to what goes on in the locker room, though certainly neither are vocal with the media or typical rah-rah guys. I could imagine that MacDonald is a popular guy, especially among the young defensemen, and maybe they wanted to give it to a d-man. I bet that his AHL time and "resurgence" actually is endearing to his teammates, and he did wear an 'A' on the island for a short time. And his beet smoothies no doubt played a vital role -- they're to die for. Filppula is a bit odder to me, but I guess veteran presence and all. He's only been with the team, summer aside, for like 2.5 months. He's never worn an 'A' in his entire time with Detroit or Tampa, as far as I know. But he does have a wise, soothing, elven quality to him.
At least no fan has to pay the extra cash to get an "A" sewn on their jerseys.
Can't believe people are getting mad that the PLAYERS chose AMac, we have no idea what goes on the room, he clearly is deserving of it. People need to get over the idea that it has to be defaulted to the best on ice players.
Voracek always seems like a real talkative guy and one of the leaders.
I've read before, I think from Meltzer, that Couturier has really developed into a quiet leader.
Thus, it will be MacDonald. No better way to get the boys pumped than with his signature beet smoothies.