maclean
Registered User
- Jan 4, 2014
- 8,629
- 2,751
You can click on the Date/Time link on the embedded tweet.
Dont even see any date/time link. Looks like a totally blank post, can only see there was a twitter link by quoting it
You can click on the Date/Time link on the embedded tweet.
Was it not Ceci that took the shot and missed the net leading to the 3 on 1?
Start hanging your head mister. It was Ceci. About his only blemish in what was a very good game but that one is on him.Could have been since he was part of the 3 man rush, didn't check before responding.
If it was Ceci then shame on me.
Hope Andersson can come back soon or Murray will have some tough decisions to take. I really liked the way Hammond played against Montreal but I don't believe he has what it takes to do it night after night.
Why? Murray said today we're just going to ride out our goaltending. There is absolutely no sense in running out and getting a goalie given where we are in the standings.
Yup, this is why you have more than two goalies in your system. If we were looking to make a run in the playoff it would be different, but this season is done. Let the minor leaguers show what they got.
Brent WallaceVerified account @tsn_wally
Craig Anderson has been activated from IR.
What now?
Dreidger goes back to the minors minors, anderson is back up
Of course! But everyone knows what I'm really asking.
I'm a huge Anderson supporter, and I think that he is the #1 goalie of this team for sure until someone takes it away from him. I just don't know if you can take the A away from the hot hand right now. Would you guys go with Hammond or Anderson on Tuesday?
I'd stick with Hammond until he loses, why change a good thing? He played back to back games in California against Ann & LA ,why can't he do it again especially if he wins Tuesday? Anderson has been hot & cold all yr, at least this kid is playing very well for us right now & not allowing any weak goals, I'd keep playing him.Of course! But everyone knows what I'm really asking.
I'm a huge Anderson supporter, and I think that he is the #1 goalie of this team for sure until someone takes it away from him. I just don't know if you can take the A away from the hot hand right now. Would you guys go with Hammond or Anderson on Tuesday?
I'd stick with Hammond until he loses, why change a good thing? He played back to back games in California against Ann & LA ,why can't he do it again especially if he wins Tuesday? Anderson has been hot & cold all yr, at least this kid is playing very well for us right now & not allowing any weak goals, I'd keep playing him.
I'd stick with Hammond until he loses, why change a good thing? He played back to back games in California against Ann & LA ,why can't he do it again especially if he wins Tuesday? Anderson has been hot & cold all yr, at least this kid is playing very well for us right now & not allowing any weak goals, I'd keep playing him.
I agree with playing Hammond until he loses, but disagree with Anderson being hot & cold.
He's been pretty consistent for us this year. He was also playing behind a struggling Maclean group and then a group that was still learning how to play under Cameron.
And somehow this is discussed in the Lehner/MacArthur thread?
Any updates on them?
Hammond played a back-to-back because we didn't have a choice
If you have a choice you don't play the same goalie two days in a row, it's not rocket surgery here people