Does Connolly still hold value? Nice gamble Chia
I dont see how. At this point I don't understand how he could have been valued at two second rounders.
I like the idea, and I like Ladd, but we won't do it as we'd be very unlikely to pay him what he wants this summer. Don't see Sweeney going after rentals at this point.
In my opinion, if the Bruins are targeting Rychel, current roster players such as Morrow and Connolly should be in play as well as anything but our 1st rounders this year, prospects drafted last year, and Khokhlachev (as Dom has pointed out as to why). Our third line has been "meh" these past couple of seasons. I'm all for management banking on the chemistry between Rychel and Khokhlachev. If a trade like that goes down, I would see what kind of defenseman Eriksson and Spooner could fetch us.
Morrow + Koko for Drouin?
Rychel has only played 16 games in the NHL, and Khokhlachev has only played 9. This is a trade that would get done when Krejci comes back which moves Spooner back to the 3rd line. If Eriksson is not re-signed, Eriksson and Spooner should be able to get you a pretty good defender which is of great need for the Bruins. Yes there is the risk that both Rychel and Khokhlachev will not perform up to expectations if that is the direction the Bruins are willing to go, but the Bruins are not winning the cup this year:So your banking on a couple of prospects who chemistry aside, have both had trouble cracking NHL line-ups of less-than-stellar forward groups, to then shop 2 proven commodities (Spooner at the very least has proven he can contribute at the NHL level)?
Rychel and Koko on the 3rd line, be prepared for more "meh". Oh and expect some increased "meh" from lines 1 and 2 without Spooner and Eriksson.
This board's fascination with other team's mid-range prospects is astounding.
So your banking on a couple of prospects who chemistry aside, have both had trouble cracking NHL line-ups of less-than-stellar forward groups, to then shop 2 proven commodities (Spooner at the very least has proven he can contribute at the NHL level)?
Rychel and Koko on the 3rd line, be prepared for more "meh". Oh and expect some increased "meh" from lines 1 and 2 without Spooner and Eriksson.
This board's fascination with other team's mid-range prospects is astounding. The fact that guys here would move proven NHL young players (yes Connolly and Morrow are proven at the NHL level whether you like them or not) for a guy who hasn't made it yet and is a comparable age range blows my mind.
I am not saying I wouldn't acquire Rychel. For the right deal sure. But I certainly wouldn't overpay by subtracting from the existing roster to get him, unless were talking guys like K.Miller, Talbot, etc which I'm absolutely certain CBJ wants no part of. If a comparable mid-range prospect + a 3rd rd pick couldn't get it done, then let him wallow in the CBJ minor league system.
If you're going to acquire Rychel, then I keep Koko.
The two together are the definition of chemistry together.
Morrow + Koko for Drouin?
I dont see how. At this point I don't understand how he could have been valued at two second rounders.
YupSome think Heinen was the teams best prospect before this draft. I'd be loathe to move him for a question mark.
When Chiarelli starting citing Steve Yzerman's word as the main source of why he thought Connolly was worth the trade, I became concerned.
This on top of the fact that Chiarelli's deadline moves last year, for a team clearly not going to make any sort of run, were to add a project player and an old fourth liner. And not move a golden pending UFA in Soderberg to a contender...
"Best GM in the league"
Spooner + Koko + 2nd.
I never do these things. I'm sure it's a stupid proposal.
Wholeheartedly agree. People get overly infatuated with prospects drafted in the first round. Doesn't matter what they've accomplished, they see "Drafted 1st Round" and are immediately willing to sell the farm to get him.
I would have 2 issues with this:
1. This would leave Ferraro as full time #3 centre? Not sure I dig that
2. To me it's too much value for a player that has, as of right now, not proven anything in the NHL
If Spoons happens to find himself on his way to Columbus, RyJo should be the guy coming back. Their stats and roles are quite similar, RyJo has the size, Spooner has fit our PP well.
Due to this 'roster crunch' we've been hearing so much about lately I would consider a deal like Spoons, Killer + something small (4th?/maybe a guy like Camera?)
The only thing most likely of value in that trade would be Spooner, and that's a big risk to take for them giving their trading away a 20 year old known talent (even if he hasn't proven much yet in the NHL).
I think that's where my whole proposal comes in. Sure, we wouldn't be winning that trade right away, but that's a necessary risk if you're looking to acquire a known offensive talent at a mere 20 years of age. He might not have proven much, but he's barely been given the necessary time to disprove himself.
I think my overall point is, you're going to have to give maybe what you and others would consider a little "too much value" to get the deal done if you really want to. K. Miller, a 4th, and a Spooner is basically like Spooner for Drouin. Which...is a big stretch. Unless Sweeney can somehow convince Steve Yzerman Kevan Miller is an "asset".
Not a proposal, just a question. Is/Can/would Bergeron be on the trade market?
Not a proposal, just a question. Is/Can/would Bergeron be on the trade market?
Not a proposal, just a question. Is/Can/would Bergeron be on the trade market?
Did these 2 play in junior together? I am not aware. Please fill us in.
GVK