Super Cake
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2013
- 31,027
- 6,473
Chiasson is three years younger though
Better fit for our budget
Melnyk would have made it work for sure (like he did for karlsson, ryan, macarthur)...... Hornqvist is a better player right now and is also 'young'
Melnyk would have made it work for sure (like he did for karlsson, ryan, macarthur)...... Hornqvist is a better player right now and is also 'young'
Had another assist last night, he's coming along nicely
needs to work on his defence, but that is teachable... scoring and a nose for the puck is not.
easier said than done
I wouldn't be surprised if Chia puts up 50 points this year
well id say hornqvist and chiuasson are comparable.
smalling isnt a terrible prospect, if paul continues to trend upwards then yeah it blows the preds offer out of the water.
why are you inclusing the 11th overall pick..did pittsburgh acquire that as well? and i would probably take pierre dorian at 11th overall.
For the record:
11th OA >>> 2nd + Guptill
I have zero faith in Guptill to be anything even remotely resembling an NHL player. To me, it's like saying a 2nd rounder is as good as the 11th overall pick - that's how little I think of Guptill.
MacArthur-Turris-Chiasson
Ryan-Zibanejad-Stone
Hoffman-Legwand-Michalek
Greening-Smith-Neil/Condra
Lazar, one more year to develop in juniors
It's Spaling and he isn't a prospect...
Because that's what was rumoured IIRC, but you're right, not going to assume rumours are facts.
The way I see it is Spezza had more value in the eyes of the Preds...
Neal for Hornqvist + Spalling
Spezza for Hornqvist + Spalling + 1st (could have been another piece attached to Spezza, so many things could have happened ad we have no idea of the reality. I'm speculating there, something I don't do a lot)
I see your point if you think that Guptill has no value. However considering his skillset and the assumption that the Sens WANTED him in the deal (and wasn't a throw in), and seeing how another prospect they wanted in Paul is doing... he might be worth something
It's also the difference between 11th OA pick in a weak draft vs mid 2nd round pick in a great draft... Not as huge as usual but yeah, it's my opinion. I'll finish saying : that's how little I think of the 2014 draft
First point: youre right i dono why i still think of him as a young up and coming kid.
second: I thought we were offered the same deal for spezza as was given for neal. could be wrong. but if we were offered the 11th..
third: i think fiala, vrana,tuch, larkin, sanheim, fabbri, deangelo are all better talents than what we will be picking from (at face value, i realize there could be a steal) in the 2nd round this year.
I think people over blow the greatness and weaknesses of every draft. theyre not all made equal, but theyre certainly isnt huge gulfs in class like fanbases make them out.
All in all i dont regret the bobby Ryan trade, and i dont regret the spezza trade.
I was super low on this 2014 draft. You're right that people over blow the greatness and weaknesses of every draft, but look back at past drafts (dating back to 1996 lol) and you'll see very big differences from year to year.
Also I didn't mean that the 2nd in 2015 has more value than the 11th OA in 2014, but Guptill + that 2nd is actually a lot closer to that 11th than people think... Many times, many teams don't even pick up a prospect as good as Guptill with that pick (not saying Guptill is an extraordinary prospect)
For fun :
1996 : Dan Focht
1997 : Jason Ward
1998 : Jeff Heerema
1999 : Oleg Saprykin
2000 : Pavel Vorobiev
2001 : Fredrik Sjostrom
2002 : Keith Ballard
2003 : Jeff Carter (one of the best drafts ever)
2004 : Lauri Tukonen
2005 : Anze Kopitar (should have been Brian Lee )
2006 : Jonathan Bernier
2007 : Brandon Sutter
2008 : Kyle Beach
2009 : Ryan Ellis
2010 : Jack Campbell
2011 : Duncan Siemens
2012 : Filip Forsberg (guy should really have been drafted higher, didn't get that one)
2013 : Samuel Morin
A few decent to great picks there, but far from a guarantee, so in a weak draft I'm not expecting those great "hits"
NOTE : I guess we can still quote each other, in retrospect I realized that I don't always disagree with you lol
I was super low on this 2014 draft. You're right that people over blow the greatness and weaknesses of every draft, but look back at past drafts (dating back to 1996 lol) and you'll see very big differences from year to year.
Also I didn't mean that the 2nd in 2015 has more value than the 11th OA in 2014, but Guptill makes it a lot closer than people think... Many times, many teams don't even pick up a prospect as good as Guptill with that pick (not saying Guptill is an extraordinary prospect). Guptill is a high boom-bust type, more likely to bust but you never know.
For fun :
1996 : Dan Focht
1997 : Jason Ward
1998 : Jeff Heerema
1999 : Oleg Saprykin
2000 : Pavel Vorobiev
2001 : Fredrik Sjostrom
2002 : Keith Ballard
2003 : Jeff Carter (one of the best drafts ever)
2004 : Lauri Tukonen
2005 : Anze Kopitar (should have been Brian Lee )
2006 : Jonathan Bernier
2007 : Brandon Sutter
2008 : Kyle Beach
2009 : Ryan Ellis
2010 : Jack Campbell
2011 : Duncan Siemens
2012 : Filip Forsberg (guy should really have been drafted higher, didn't get that one)
2013 : Samuel Morin
A few decent to great picks there, but far from a guarantee, so in a weak draft I'm not expecting those great "hits" (notice how the hits are in general in great draft years)
NOTE : I guess we can still quote each other, in retrospect I realized that I don't always disagree with you lol
knew you'd come around, curious as to what changes your mind