bennysflyers16
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2004
- 84,691
- 62,760
Sometimes it’s fun to just be a spectator in these types of threads.
Don’t mind me, I’m just over here behaving myself like a good noodle.
Go to bed
Sometimes it’s fun to just be a spectator in these types of threads.
Don’t mind me, I’m just over here behaving myself like a good noodle.
For everyone saying AV is a bad hire, who would have been better? I see a lot of people making this claim but not many suggesting alternatives that are better options then AV is.
The Vancouver roster he inherited was good, but no powerhouse. They were never a top 5 talented team in the NHL. And definitely neither were the Rangers, who overachieved under both Torts and Vigneault, who are both excellent coaches who tend to get results that exceed their teams' talent levels.
Most of the people against the Vigneault hire wanted Sheldon Keefe or bust, because he's the Corsi darling.For everyone saying AV is a bad hire, who would have been better? I see a lot of people making this claim but not many suggesting alternatives that are better options then AV is.
Are you suggesting that any one without some degree of experience and demonstrable success in the NHL was ever a legitimate option? Or should we interview every one who has ever coached hockey in any league in the world in hopes that we find one that really knocks our socks off in an interview? Due diligence and all...
You cant be serious?
Those 2010-11 and 11-12 Nucks teams was easily a top 5 talented team in NHL
Sedins , Luongo , Kesler , Edler , Burrows , Schneider etc , etc
My fictional son’s hockey coach would do a bang-up job.
He is here all the time. You would know that if you yourself were here that much.Am I missing something as to why a Blackhawks fan is in here arguing and trashing our hire.
Most of the people against the Vigneault hire wanted Sheldon Keefe or bust, because he's the Corsi darling.
A love of Corsi and a "modern" swarm defense that worked in the AHL didn't turn out so hot for Dallas Eakins when he moved to the NHL, but that tends to get ignored. A lot of people think you can just snap your fingers, tell your players to maintain possession, and bingo -- your players will automatically be able to execute it and succeed at any level.
Most of the people against the Vigneault hire wanted Sheldon Keefe or bust, because he's the Corsi darling.
A love of Corsi and a "modern" swarm defense that worked in the AHL didn't turn out so hot for Dallas Eakins when he moved to the NHL, but that tends to get ignored. A lot of people think you can just snap your fingers, tell your players to maintain possession, and bingo -- your players will automatically be able to execute it and succeed at any level.
What’s to say though that Keefe would have even been interested... it’s quite possible that he’s comfortable waiting in Toronto to see if they grow tired of Babcock and then be the front runner for that job. Now that may not necessarily happen for a few seasons or at all but as a new coach looking to cut my teeth in the league, I’d rather wait for a situation I’m comfortable with, instead of rushing into a job that may not be an easy fix. If things go south for AV in Philly, he will likely get another crack but if things go south for Keefe, that could be it for a while and possibly at all.
I have no idea if Keefe would've been interested in the Flyers. For all I know he is simply waiting for the seemingly inevitable Babcock firing in Toronto.What’s to say though that Keefe would have even been interested... it’s quite possible that he’s comfortable waiting in Toronto to see if they grow tired of Babcock and then be the front runner for that job. Now that may not necessarily happen for a few seasons or at all but as a new coach looking to cut my teeth in the league, I’d rather wait for a situation I’m comfortable with, instead of rushing into a job that may not be an easy fix. If things go south for AV in Philly, he will likely get another crack but if things go south for Keefe, that could be it for a while and possibly at all.
you might find him on edmontons ahl team forum.Is Boxcar still around?
Haven't seen him chime in on this hire and he stopped coming to Hawks board for some mysterious reason
That's not actually why any of us wanted Keefe. I don't think I've ever heard the word "Corsi" mentioned in relation to Keefe. The reason he's a hot commodity is he's done well with young players and won AHL titles with them. If we wanted a guy who was a Corsi darling we should just go get Babcock.
I was told if I behaved I could stay up lateGo to bed
No AHL coach says no to an NHL job.
If Fletcher does his job there won't be any bad vets on the roster, including Hagg and MacDonald.
If that's the case then the worst he can do is what, overplay Raffl and Hartman? If Simmonds were still here it might be a concern.
One of the biggest problems the Flyers have is that they never hit the blue line with speed, something Fletcher alluded to in his presser. It sounds like AV will definitely fix that. If he has a decent breakout system and our special teams don't suck, he'll be an upgrade. Let's carry on.
Babcock doesn't obsess over Corsi -- he has poked fun at it before, like a lot of coaches have. His Detroit teams had great Corsis because of the types of players they had, but he's not a Corsi fanatic, per se.
There have been dozens of stories discussing Keefe's fondness for advanced metrics and extreme focus on puck possession. I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing at all. I'm intrigued. But out of curiosity I'd like to see him take over a poor NHL team and see how it goes.
100%, but Hak did zero to appeal to any of them.
Hexys blindness to him is the only way he’s back in NHL imo.
Is Boxcar still around?
Haven't seen him chime in on this hire and he stopped coming to Hawks board for some mysterious reason