TheOtherOne
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2010
- 8,274
- 5,272
The Bishop tripping penalty in context with the Paquette interference call is insane. Either the player needs to steer clear far enough of the goalie or does not.
Both situations... a case can be made for both sides. The consistency is what irks me more than anything. My take is that while the goalie is not "fair game", the Paquette penalty should not happen because the Mrazek came out of the crease and made contact. Bishop was well within the crease and the player chose to skate into it. Neither Bishop's foot nor stick left the crease at any point.
Why do Mrazek and Tatar get protected on opposite ends of similar plays but Bishop and Paquette don't. Either both plays are GI or both are Tripping.
Bishop's trip was REALLY sketchy. I don't think there was a penalty there. However. .. I don't have a lot of sympathy because he opened the door for that call when he tackled Tatar. My god that was a stupid play. I'm sorry but if he started the game with the benefit of the doubt, he threw it away on that play.