Canucks1096
Registered User
- Feb 13, 2016
- 5,608
- 1,667
Why stop at this year? Why not take all the years Sutter has played and match it against all the years Gaudette has played and say Sutter has clearly scored more? It would be true, but it would still be a sample skewed by your cut off points.
I think you would have been better off separating the two totals: regular season and playoffs. Like everyone does. You didn’t do that because you have a vested interest in proving Gaudette is inferior. I get it.
By all means, skew it how you wish. Gaudette is clearly the better offensive player. Removing his PP production and rejigging the season sample to fit your position isn’t going to change anything.
You're making a big fuss about it because it show Sutter has a better ppg with RS and playoffs. Pretend Gaudette ES and playoffs ppg was higher and someone posted it, would you make that big of a fuss? The answer is No, you can called skewed if you wish too but I took every game this year to come up with that nunber. I didn't take some random 20 game sample in the middle of the year. Even if you want it skewed, for it to show Sutter has a higher ppg in that big if sample. It said a lot about Gaudette game considering the fact you don't think Sutter is a good offensive player.
You're taking my post the wrong way. You wrote with Gaudette, we can have 3 scoring lines, he was on pace for 46 points playing on the third line. My post wasn't really meant the to compare two players. I am giving you example of what you're saying Gaudette got 46 points from the 3rd was not accurate at all. You didn't provide any context with his 46 points. Gaudette point production at 5 on 5 It is considered high 4th line center. Gaudette on pace for about 17 ppp this year on the 2nd unit. That point production just wasn't sustainable at all. In the playoff Canucks 17 games without a ppg from the 2nd unit. That is main reason why Gaudette went points
Your assessment was Gaudette is completely off. He is just that good of a player. Another reason why I am focusing 5 on 5 because it is more sustainable. Most 2nd unit pp don't score a lot which those ppp are harder to be sustainable
Pretend if this was Virtanen and not Sutter. The conversation will be probably different
Have a great day. Feel free to be in your Gaudette fantasy world