This is pretty much what I was saying a month ago when we did our projected lines for next year and some scoffed at the prospect of so much youth in the lineup. There's plenty of reason to go that way for at least one year and get some guys some ice time and see what you have. They did it for Wilson, Kuz and Bura this year and they'll probably do more of it with other guys next season, especially with the FA crop coming up. Pretty sound approach that just happens to unfortunately and potentially burn another year of Ovechkin's viability...but the return the following year could be greater. I think we're in the midst of a 3 year plan. lol
I don't think we're going to see a cat and mouse game with Fehr and Ward. They're probably gone. But I do think they want a temporary 1RW in the 5M to 5.5M range. The rest of the roster will be budget with some flexibility at the TDL in case there's a serious need.
Yeah I think this is a sound strategy as well. Giving the youth a year of experience and gear up for the year after.
Trying to make a quick fix to save 1 year of Ovechkin can end up costing us a couple years of his after this next one.
Fehr and Ward are most certainly gone unless neither gets good offers in UFA (unlikely)
Langway posted the data sometime back, but look at the teams he collected his points against this season. The breakdown is comical.
http://espn.go.com/nhl/player/gamelog/_/id/3879/jay-beagle
Gordon has a lot better offense and is one of the better PKers in the league. Hendricks brings a physical and speed element that Beagle can't match.
huh??? Beagle is much faster than Hendricks and much bigger too.
Which of these 3 players have scored in double digits in the league in any given year? I believe Beagle is the only one.
Gordon is soft as butter and small. Hendricks played bigger than his size but he wasn't as good defensively or on the draws as Beagle is.
Discussing who's offense is better is pointless because not one of these 3 is a good offensive player. They are comprable and we can call it a push. 5-10 goals per year and perhaps 10-15 assits each.
Beagle is bigger and better on draws
I would love to see a Kessel deal if the Leafs are willing to retain 2 million. Kessel for 7 years at 6 mil? Why not.
1. Acquisition cost - Kessel at 2 mil retained will want to bring back 2-3 extremely good young assets.
2. Cap hit - His cap hit will still be $6 million
3. Term - He's signed for several more years. He doesn't keep in shape and is far far from a workout warrior which means chances are he will decline faster than you think (hello Mike Richards)
4 His 'tude - He's not a great defensive player at all and that is one thing Trotz demands.
5 If it doesn't work out we are stuck with him forever.
6 It will prevent us from going after a much better fit at this time next year. Guys like Okposo and ROR will be UFAs and they work FAR better for us.