g00n
Retired Global Mod
- Nov 22, 2007
- 30,685
- 14,869
Who is paying $100 a night or more to watch a NASA person do their job? Don't get me wrong I appreciate their work but I am not shelling out to watch them. There also aren't major networks bidding over showing what they do. If the players all took 500k a year or something you are fooling yourself if you don't think the owners would just pocket the difference. This is a business. Ticket prices are set by how much they think they can charge. And if they still think they can get $100 a night from us then they will charge that.
Resentment over what they make is the result of ignorance or jealousy or both. I totally get laying into a guy who makes too much for what he contributes like Laich. He got paid and didn't produce anywhere near his contract. But for a guy like Holtby who is top 5 or 10 in the league at his position I don't get it unless he falls apart later. If he comes in at 5.5 that is a damn bargain. Whether we think is it wise to pay goalies that much is another business thing.
And there are sports out there for less. Minor league sports are far cheaper. Why? Because there is far less demand for it. The only way pro hockey or pro any sport gets less expensive is if lots of people stop watching or going to the games. And that isn't happening.
These questions have largely been answered already. It's why player unions formed, and why free agency in pro sports came about in the 70s.
There are some bloated contracts out there but by and large a lot of what's happened on the labor front has benefitted the players filling out the lower rungs. The less the big boys get and the more power the owners have, the easier it is to pay non-guaranteed, small contracts to bit players and dispose of them whenever convenient including in the case of injury. Unless the union is so bad it doesn't plan for this.