EYEuhFRAYtee
Smile
- Apr 28, 2004
- 3,076
- 958
More controversial opinion:
Orpik can get back in game shape in the next 2.5 months
vs.
Chorney > Orpik
More controversial opinion:
Orpik can get back in game shape in the next 2.5 months
vs.
Chorney > Orpik
Brooks Orpik isn't Eddie Lacy. He's not sitting around eating Ho-Hos.
More controversial opinion:
Orpik can get back in game shape in the next 2.5 months
vs.
Chorney > Orpik
So it’s time to trade Ladd and make the most of what has disintegrated into a mess.
The Jets haven’t spoken in meaningful terms with Ladd’s camp for some time, instead focusing on Byfuglien.
The most likely outcome now is the Jets signing Byfuglien and then making Ladd available on the trade market. Executives around the NHL have told their pro scouts to compile reports on Ladd and to back off on the Byfuglien book.
Somewhere between the NHL draft last summer and now, the business relationship between Ladd and the Jets soured. Now it has infected the personal and the hockey relationship between a proud captain and his organization.
Ladd knows the reality of his situation and not too long ago told TSN he understands the business and the reality of the trade deadline. He’ll either be signed or moved. With no ongoing talks between the team and his reps, Ladd has to believe he’ll soon be traded. He’s been wounded by this knowledge.
Jets writer on TSN. Link: http://www.tsn.ca/it-s-time-for-the-jets-to-trade-ladd-1.428215
Ladd is a player many teams could use. Won't be cheap.
Pens obviously.
Ladd's playoff numbers with the Hawks are very underwhelming.
Reminds you of someone?
Ladd and Byuf are such perfect fits for this team.
Ladd's playoff numbers with the Hawks are very underwhelming.
Can't imagine the Caps would beat the offer than several teams will make for Ladd.
He was a third-liner both years, just with no special teams role. That makes it a bit more understandable but a guy like Andrew Shaw has had better playoff runs with them (albeit with PP time).He was 24/25 playing 4th line minutes (12:36 ESTOI in 2009, 12:33 in 2010).
Yeah you'd have to give him the benefit of the doubt but I don't have a hard time doing so.