You'll work hard for the guy who is carrying their weight and then some, as opposed to the guy whose skill will yield a loss no matter how much support he's given.
What we saw through Nov 1 was a group of forwards and defensemen who knew, going into each game, that there was a very high likelihood of their effort, no matter the quality, going to waste.
Count me among those who, upon learning Luongo was going to start, EXPECTED a win and wasn't remotely surprised by the outcome.
The fact that we got this result on the 2nd of a back-to-back against a Stanley Cup favorite should tell you quite a bit about what Luongo inspires in those other men and, even with Barkov rocking the "C," who the real captain is.
i was excited to hear lou would be in as well and also expected a good result. he's a great guy, clearly loved, still a very good goaltender who's a HOFer. i agree with you that his presence impacted the team's psyche.
the point i was making was that if this was a mature team with solid leadership on the ice, they might be able to overcome the occasional poor goaltending or missing top D (for another example) by playing smarter. especially the way we are scoring goals right now.
to look at it from another angle - how would you want the team to play in front of monty if/when he starts picking up starts?
do you want them to play a little smarter and more conservatively?
maybe not try those blind backhand passes into our slot (WTF???) that seem to end up on our opponents stick every game?
maybe figure out how to manage the puck a bit better so that when we have to give it up, we put it somewhere we have at least a 50/50 chance of getting it back? and then work their asses off to win that 50/50 battle?
reimer is a NHL backup. he's let in a soft goal or two but you can't put all of this on him.
hutchinson on the other hand...