Kipper 17
Registered User
You really believe Radulov, with his play of late, is one of the top 3 options?Bowness isn't smart, but going with your top three options is a good call.
You really believe Radulov, with his play of late, is one of the top 3 options?Bowness isn't smart, but going with your top three options is a good call.
Pavelski has been scoring a lot too lately. Those two, regardless the quality of their attempts were pretty reasonable choices. Radulov, not so much...I think people are more mad at Bowness than Radulov. I know I am.
Seguin is 50% in the shootout, no one is going to question that. I was shocked to see Radulov out there with the way he’s been playing. There were multiple better options.
Sure but you shouldn’t just ignore how bad a player has been recently when choosing shooters. Obviously you don’t agree with that though.Of active NHLers
Seguin 3rd in SO%
Pavelski 38th in SO%
Radulov 40th in SO%
Top three on the team.
Should've shot before Rads imho.
Sure but you shouldn’t just ignore how bad a player has been recently when choosing shooters. Obviously you don’t agree with that though.
But how many attempts do our young guns like Gurianov or Hintz have in their careers? That's right, they are not veterans unlike the players you just mentioned.Of active NHLers
Seguin 3rd in SO%
Pavelski 38th in SO%
Radulov 40th in SO%
Top three on the team.
Of active NHLers
Seguin 3rd in SO%
Pavelski 38th in SO%
Radulov 40th in SO%
Top three on the team.
But how many attempts do our young guns like Gurianov or Hintz have in their careers? That's right, they are not veterans unlike the players you just mentioned.
Based on recent games there's no f***ing way Radulov should be our guy with the game on the line.
A players confidence matters. I would argue that is even more true for Radulov and he didn’t look too confident in that shootout attempt.Not really because play during regulation time and a shootout attempt is a completely different beast.
Just like it was last year, right? We were closer to beating them in a series than the Bruins were.Another loss to St. Louis. Going to be pretty much impossible to beat them in the playoffs.
How many shifts in OT did Hintz and Gurianov need to score? Game was on the line then and they didn't capitalize.
That's a terrible argument. If anybody capitalized during OT we wouldn't have had to figure out our shooting trio in the first place.How many shifts in OT did Hintz and Gurianov need to score? Game was on the line then and they didn't capitalize.
Eh, I'd have even put Miro before Benn but I get your point.Should've been Seguin-Pavelski-Gurianov-Hintz-Radulov-Perry-Benn
Another loss to St. Louis. Going to be pretty much impossible to beat them in the playoffs.
By the way Gurianov played 23 shifts this game and only ended up with 13:30 ish of icetime . Part of this has to be on him . He's playing alot of shifts just very short shifts.
Radulov only played 14 shifts but ended up with 15:52 . Most of that is because he was out there on the ice for that awful 5 minute defensive shift with 2 icings . Don't think after that shift he played much anymore if at all.
Think Comeau was the 6th skater with the Seguin unit and Benn or Seguin the one with the Hintz unit .
This is completely unacceptable by Radulov. Something like that would get 99% of hockey players at every level benched.