50 in 50 Tracker

[FelixPotvin29]

Note that Mack has the most EV strength goals in the league (all 7).

Impressive

 

[Frank Drebin]

Memories fade and younger people whom see the numbers or youtube clips might not get it - but Neely was nearly unstoppable. He was the (or top 2) best goal-scorers while being one of the toughest guys in the league and was nearly unstoppable - until '......' realized the only way to do it was to purposefully take out his knee.

"The hit" didn't actually injure Neely, it was actually Neely trying to exact revenge on ulf where he hurt his knee. He's said so much himself in interviews.

 

[Miltons tomatoplant]

Above pace:
Matthews 10 in 7
Palmieri 7 in 4
Pastrnak 7 in 6
MacKinnon 7 in 6
DeBrincat 6 in 5

On pace:
Bergeron 6 in 6
Ovechkin 6 in 6
Toews 5 in 5
Kane 5 in 5
McDavid 4 in 4

 

[Kingsfan1]

None of them will get it

 

[Cloned]

None of them will get it

Plot twist: all of them get it. 2018-2019 is the first season with 10 65+ goal scorers.

 

[Miltons tomatoplant]

The list is getting short and sad .

Above pace:
Matthews 10 in 8
Pastrnak 8 in 7
Palmieri 7 in 5

On pace:
MacKinnon 7 in 7
Ovechkin 6 in 6
DeBrincat 6 in 6

 

[Sam Spade]

The list is getting short and sad .

Above pace:
Matthews 10 in 8
Pastrnak 8 in 7
Palmieri 7 in 5

On pace:
MacKinnon 7 in 7
Ovechkin 6 in 6
DeBrincat 6 in 6

Of course because goal scoring is the hardest thing in the sport to do.

 

[Leon Lucius Black]

Sven Andrighetto on pace for 50 in 50 after last night's game.

 

[Miltons tomatoplant]

No he's not. It's 50 goals in the team's first 50 goals .

Also, no need to point out the obvious that no one will get to 50 in 50. Everyone knows it already. It's about who'll keep pace the longest. Newsflash: the posters in the last team to lose thread weren't expecting any 82-0 season either.

 

[swissexpert]

No he's not. It's 50 goals in the team's first 50 goals .

Now that would be an epic record

 

[JianYang]

If we can get a small handful of players over the 50 goal mark for the season, I'll take it. I'd be more interested keeping track of that pace.

 

[Teemu]

Kane and DeBrincat both pick up their 7th in 7

 

[Avsavsavsavsavs]

Mack gets his 8th in 8. Landeskog comin in hot with 5 goals in 2 games for 7 in 8.

 

[Miltons tomatoplant]

Now that would be an epic record

True. Meant to say 50 goals in a team's first 50 games but fair enough comment.

Matthews 10 in 9
Pastrnak 8 in 7 but will play tonight still
Palmieri 7 in 6

On pace:
MacKinnon 8 in 8
Ovechkin 6 in 6
DeBrincat 7 in 7
Kane 7 in 7

 

[Bedards Dad]

OP Updated

Above Pace ( 1+ GPG)

Player	Goals	Games
Auston Matthews	10	9
Kyle Palmieri	7	6

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

On Pace (1 GPG)

Nathan MacKinnon	8	8
David Pastrnask	8	8

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Just Below (.95 - .99 GPG)
None

 

[AvsFan29]

Landeskog has 7 in 8.

That's as close as you can get without being on pace, so I guess he's "just below"?

 

[Pierce Hawthorne]

Landeskog has 7 in 8.

That's as close as you can get without being on pace, so I guess he's "just below"?

Theres still dozens of guys on that same pace. If he has 13 goals in 14 games, then yeah its probably worth following.

 

[Bedards Dad]

Landeskog has 7 in 8.

That's as close as you can get without being on pace, so I guess he's "just below"?

He is at .875 GPG, which isn't .95 GPG or above.

 

[filinski77]

He is at .875 GPG, which isn't .95 GPG or above.

In all fairness, 0.95 GPG isn't even possible until 18 goals in 19 games, in which point it will be more likely than not that there are 0 players total with a 0.95 GPG or higher anyways.

 

[Bedards Dad]

In all fairness, 0.95 GPG isn't even possible until 18 goals in 19 games, in which point it will be more likely than not that there are 0 players total with a 0.95 GPG or higher anyways.

That's true. I can move it to .9 gpg, but below that there's lots of guys, and where does the cutoff start?

 

[filinski77]

That's true. I can move it to .9 gpg, but below that there's lots of guys, and where does the cutoff start?

That's fair, I would even move to players that have 1 goal under a goal per game. At 10 games that's still only 9 goals, and by 20+ games we are likely to see no-one for now. At least with 1 goal under, it'll be fun to see players who only need 2 goals in their next game to get back on track

 

[AvsFan29]

Theres still dozens of guys on that same pace. If he has 13 goals in 14 games, then yeah its probably worth following.

There are 3 players on that pace

 

[AvsFan29]

He is at .875 GPG, which isn't .95 GPG or above.

So he would need 19 in 20 games to hit .95? Lol

 

[Dessert Nights]

Does someone have a list of league's top 3 goal scorers in team's first 50 games for every season since 05-06?

 

[Bedards Dad]

So he would need 19 in 20 games to hit .95? Lol

Yes. This isn't about who is just under 50 in 50, its about who hits it. I get wanting to see your guys name on my meaningless list, and was going to make a change based on filinski77's solid reco (within 1 goal), but I don't like your attitude, so the OP will stay the way it is.