1865
Alpha Couturier
Top 5 pick. Say it all together, top 5 pick.
Not ambitious enough. Top three.
Top 5 pick. Say it all together, top 5 pick.
I believe, since McKenna was picked up on waivers, he may not be demoted to AHL for some period of time/ number of gamesI'm sorry but was it necessary to play McKenna here? Is Fletcher thinking McKenna is an upgrade to say Lyon? Because Lyon is way better, McKenna should be on the Phantoms.
Where's the fanboy love for JVR now? Guy is a terrible addition to this team. Our division is not the right one for his style of play. Getting a high scoring forward from the Laffs isn't too different from getting the best defenseman on the Islanders...ahem AMac.
I think JoJo pointed out astutely that everyone wants a pure goal scorer yet no one is happy with JVR and certainly not Simmonds. Simmonds is still on pace for 25+ goals. The Venn diagram covering the people complaining about all of the above is pretty big.
I believe, since McKenna was picked up on waivers, he may not be demoted to AHL for some period of time/ number of games
The trip through Canada at the end of Hakstol’s reign was pretty bleeping bad.
That said, the notion that this team’s issue is coaching is laughable.
What was the explanation for Gostisbehere getting penalized after the goal reversal?
Appeared to commit the infraction after the offsides.
78.7 Coach’s Challenge – The video review mechanism triggered by the Coach’s Challenge is intended to be extremely narrow in scope and the original call on the ice is to be overturned if, and only if, a determination is made that the original call on the ice was not correct. If a review is not conclusive and/or there is any doubt whatsoever as to whether the call on the ice was correct, the original call on the ice will be confirmed. NOTE: Only one Coach’s Challenge per team per stoppage will be permitted. A team may only request a Coach’s Challenge to review the following scenarios: (i) “Off-side” Play Leading to a Goal – A play that results in a “GOAL” call on the ice where the defending team asserts that the play should have been stopped by reason of an “Off-side” infraction by the attacking team.
(a) The standard for overturning the call in the event of a “GOAL” call on the ice is that the NHL Situation Room, after reviewing any and all available replays and consulting with the Linesman, determines that one or more Players on the attacking team preceded the puck into the attacking zone prior to the goal being scored and that, as a result, the play should have been stopped for an “Off-side” infraction; where this standard is met, the goal will be disallowed.
(b) If the result of the challenge is that the play was “On-side”, the goal shall count and the team that issued the challenge shall be assessed a minor penalty for delaying the game.
(c) In the event a goal is reversed due to the NHL Situation Room (after consulting with the Linesman) determining that the play was “Off-side” prior to the goal being scored, the clock (including penalty time clocks, if applicable) will be re-set to the time at which the play should have been stopped for the “Off-side” infraction.
NOTE 1: Goals will only be reviewed for a potential “Off-side” infraction if: (a) the puck does not come out of the attacking zone again; or (b) all members of the attacking team do not clear the attacking zone again, between the time of the “Off-side” play and the time the goal is scored.
NOTE 2: If one or more penalties (major or minor) are assessed between the time of the “Off-side” play and the video review that disallows the apparent goal, the offending team(s) (and responsible Player(s)) will still be required to serve the penalty(ies) identified and assessed, and the time of the penalty(ies) will be recorded as the time at which the play should have been stopped for the “Off-side” infraction.
I don't even know what needs to happen to this team for them to wake up.
<10 minutes left in the game and they realize, oh ****, we're down by 3, let's draw up some ****ing plays and score goals. So they score 2, but there's 6 seconds left on the clock by the time they do that.
Why aren't we drawing up plays when we go down by 1? Where is the creativity when you need it?
Shouldve never gave the SLUG his deal in the 1st place.Don’t know what people expected from JVR. He is exactly what anyone should have known he would be.
Which is a fine complimentary piece used in a scoring role. He. Hasn’t been used properly at all, no clue what our org is doing with him.
I think JoJo pointed out astutely that everyone wants a pure goal scorer yet no one is happy with JVR and certainly not Simmonds. Simmonds is still on pace for 25+ goals. The Venn diagram covering the people complaining about all of the above is pretty big.
JVR has shown he can be an efficient scorer and even positive possession player with any reasonable linemates. REASONABLE
perhaps, GM made a decision to let just one team tailspin rather than both.Our GM decided to pick him up off waivers when he could have played Lyon. Either way, it was a piss poor job
I wouldn't blame anyone here for hitting a small mammal with their car if it were caught in the middle of the road
Tell the Flyers to be better. I'm not gonna run over a skunk, and there isn't much wildlife in the streets of Center City Philadelphia. There's hate in my heart, and the pain I feel deserves to be felt by everything. But fear not, reptiles, amphibians, and birds are also fair game.I just wanted to let everyone on here know that if I hear about anyone hitting small mammals with their cars, I will deliver a beating.
We have to break the record for number of goalies played in a year. We tied it last night! Since the season is over, this is what I look forward to - breaking the record for goalie futility in a season! We only need one more goalie! I'm hoping to swing a trade for Talbot to get that contract off of their hands.I'm sorry but was it necessary to play McKenna here? Is Fletcher thinking McKenna is an upgrade to say Lyon? Because Lyon is way better, McKenna should be on the Phantoms.
Where's the fanboy love for JVR now? Guy is a terrible addition to this team. Our division is not the right one for his style of play. Getting a high scoring forward from the Laffs isn't too different from getting the best defenseman on the Islanders...ahem AMac.
Was bout to lose my ****. O/U was 6.5. If I lost because Gordon decided to challenge a meaningless goal I was gonna be irate lol
I don’t understand the intention behind that clause. Seems pretty stupid
You are joking, right? I just have to ask...I'm 99% sure you are, but want to clarify. To me, by FAR most over rated player in league. Just watch. No one is weaker on puck then him. Horrible passer. Bad decisions. Poor skater. Have to admit, he gets points, but I think that is more of a factor of playing with Giroux and and everything that entails then anything else. If he wasn't in a good situation, hed be a 40 point a year guy...absolutely top end.this was one of those games where coots staked his claim as a clear number 1 center in this league, and really a force to reckoned with.
You are joking, right? I just have to ask...I'm 99% sure you are, but want to clarify. To me, by FAR most over rated player in league. Just watch. No one is weaker on puck then him. Horrible passer. Bad decisions. Poor skater. Have to admit, he gets points, but I think that is more of a factor of playing with Giroux and and everything that entails then anything else. If he wasn't in a good situation, hed be a 40 point a year guy...absolutely top end.
You are joking, right? I just have to ask...I'm 99% sure you are, but want to clarify. To me, by FAR most over rated player in league. Just watch. No one is weaker on puck then him. Horrible passer. Bad decisions. Poor skater. Have to admit, he gets points, but I think that is more of a factor of playing with Giroux and and everything that entails then anything else. If he wasn't in a good situation, hed be a 40 point a year guy...absolutely top end.