joshjull
Registered User
I don't believe you. In fact, I get the sense you're not really looking forward to it at all.I can't wait for him to trade for more complete crap from other teams as his history has shown. Really looking forward to it.
I don't believe you. In fact, I get the sense you're not really looking forward to it at all.I can't wait for him to trade for more complete crap from other teams as his history has shown. Really looking forward to it.
I don't believe you. In fact, I get the sense you're not really looking forward to it at all.
I can't wait for him to trade for more complete crap from other teams as his history has shown. Really looking forward to it.
I get this reaction but I said this at the time. Botts viewed moving out ROR as freeing up space now and going forward for acquisitions.The ”Skinner wouldn’t happen without ROR trade” statement is such a joke.
Skinner had a one year deal and we added 5.25 in the Pittsburgh trade, how about just skipping the Pittsburgh deal? Berglund had an expensive long term deal as well.
I can't wait for him to trade for more complete crap from other teams as his history has shown. Really looking forward to it.
That's like saying I have more faith in my Mets winning a championship than my Bengals.I have more faith in Botts than I ever did in Housley.
The ”Skinner wouldn’t happen without ROR trade” statement is such a joke.
Skinner had a one year deal and we added 5.25 in the Pittsburgh trade, how about just skipping the Pittsburgh deal? Berglund had an expensive long term deal as well.
The ”Skinner wouldn’t happen without ROR trade” statement is such a joke.
Skinner had a one year deal and we added 5.25 in the Pittsburgh trade, how about just skipping the Pittsburgh deal? Berglund had an expensive long term deal as well.
A year in which a team has rookies playing key roles is a transition year man.
Which is troublesome that instead of finding a scorer in a sweatheart deal like Skinner -- who wanted to be close to home and kept the value down for what he provided -- could have been had at the time prior to "having" to make the O'Reilly deal. Bring in Skinner, don't make in the Hunwick deal and they all fit.
A year in which a team has rookies playing key roles is a transition year man. I'm not going to continue to argue with you about it, as its just a waste of both of our time. Going into this year this team was always at best a fringe wildcard team, and they were well in the playoff race into March. In my eyes that is an improvement compared to the previous few seasons.
When you strip a team completely down in order to get high draft picks and sign below average players to huuge contracts, you are going to suffer for a while. I think next season will be a huge improvement. Botteril has proven to be good at acquiring talent (Skinner, Montour, and Scandella trades, Pilut signing, and what's looking to be an excellent 2017 draft) and his only gaffe so far was the ROR trade, a trade in which I think he had his decision made up for him by ownership.
If this team continues to struggle next season then I think Botts absolutely should get canned. But at this time I don't see how another GM firing helps this team.
Some questions I’d like to ask:
None of your free agent signings during year one are playing in the NHL right now, how do you feel about your ability to identify cheap NHL talent?
Actually of all your year one deals (trades included) only O’Reagan and Scandella will be left on the team.
Follow up: all of your added NHL players during the summer that are still on the team have none or negative value - what does that tell you about your ability to add value to the team?
What would you offer for Sobotka, Sheary or Hunwick right now?
Years back there was a Leafs fansite that did an article asking who would be a better GM: Dave Nonnis or a baked potato? This applies here.I don’t pretend to know what it takes to run a NHL franchise, and I don’t think the arm chair GMs here should either.
It’s great to have an opinion, but stop acting like you know all the facts.
Brian Burke?Years back there was a Leafs fansite that did an article asking who would be a better GM: Dave Nonnis or a baked potato? This applies here.
I'd go with the baked potato over either of them TBH.Brian Burke?
Brian Burke?
A year in which a team has rookies playing key roles is a transition year man. I'm not going to continue to argue with you about it, as its just a waste of both of our time. Going into this year this team was always at best a fringe wildcard team, and they were well in the playoff race into March. In my eyes that is an improvement compared to the previous few seasons.
When you strip a team completely down in order to get high draft picks and sign below average players to huuge contracts, you are going to suffer for a while. I think next season will be a huge improvement. Botteril has proven to be good at acquiring talent (Skinner, Montour, and Scandella trades, Pilut signing, and what's looking to be an excellent 2017 draft) and his only gaffe so far was the ROR trade, a trade in which I think he had his decision made up for him by ownership.
If this team continues to struggle next season then I think Botts absolutely should get canned. But at this time I don't see how another GM firing helps this team.