Pitlick in the top 6 never makes sense.
Absurd that you believed TK didn't belong in the top 9, but are perfectly comfortable with Pitlick in the top 6.
My point on TK was away from Couts he played at a 4th line level for the last three seasons according to advanced metrics.
That is, he wasn't a good fit with most centers and most lines, and didn't make his teammates better - and everyone looks good with Couts.
But you consistently ignore context to score "points." Does that make you feel like a smart guy on the internet?
I'm not "comfortable" with Pitlick in the "top 6", although the Hayes line will probably play as many minutes as the Frost line.
It's just the best of a bunch of bad alternatives. Pitlick will at least forecheck and get the puck to two top offensive players.
JVR's problem is the Flyers don't have a center who'd be a good fit outside Couts, and since they match Couts' line against the opponent's top line on a regular basis, he's not a good fit there. They tried him with Hayes, and the contrast with Laughton is stark.
Would he work with Patrick? Who knows since Patrick can't get on the ice.
So unless we trade for Bozak, my suspicion is JVR is headed out of town at some point, because he's a bit of a waste on the 4th line (though he's put up good metrics with Raffl and Pitlick, so maybe this was also about sending a message to him that he needs to focus on more than scoring points).