GapToothedWonder
Registered User
I am surprised you did not mention 1980 USA Olympic hockey team... etc etc.. 16 win in hockey is no fluke.. did you see contender today? Sorry, I did not.
I am surprised you did not mention 1980 USA Olympic hockey team... etc etc.. 16 win in hockey is no fluke.. did you see contender today? Sorry, I did not.
Just for sh*ts and giggles, lets look at the some stats IN A GAME WHERE WE NEVER HAD THE LEAD
Defensemens 5v5 icetime
Sanheim - 17:34
Provorov - 16:52
Niskanen - 14:24
Braun - 14:18
Myers - 13:07
Ghost - 11:00
Hagg - 7:43
Ridiculous. Now you may be thinking "But Striiker, you idiot, maybe Ghost had a bad game?!".
Eye test? Absolutely not, he looked great again in all 3 zones. What do the stats say? Well let's take a looksee...
AVs bottom pair rotation...
5v5 CF%
Ghost: 63.64
Myers: 42.86
Hagg: 20.00
5v5 CF%rel
Ghost: 3.07
Myers: -21.85
Hagg: -46.67
5v5 xGF%
Ghost: 66.01
Myers: 29.02
Hagg: 19.09
5v5 xGF%rel
Ghost: 8.51
Myers: -32.24
Hagg: -41.97
Which forwards did Ghost play the most with? The Hayes line, of course!
Laughton-Hayes-Farabee, as a line:
CF%: 37.50
CF%rel: -29.17
xGF%: 29.15
xGF%rel: -34.10
This is a defensemen who just last game had one of the best games, from any of our D, and then the coaches randomly decide to dress 7 D, bury him, use him with a crap line the most, and not even throw him out at the end of the game when they pulled the goalie. What a joke.
------------------------------------
OK, forget the defensemen, lets take a look at how bad Frost must have been to get benched with the game on the line in the 3rd, and only play 11:31 at 5v5.
Again, eye test says good (except for on the PP), so what do the stats say?
Frost
CF%: 75.00
CF%rel: 19.83
xGF%: 60.30
xGF%rel: 3.18
And the Giroux-Frost-TK line as a whole?
CF%: 80.95 (best on team)
CF%rel: 26.85 (best on team)
xGF%: 82.55 (best on team)
xGF%rel: 28.71 (best on team)
That looks like a line that definitely needed to be split up!
But hey, what do I know, I'm just a fan! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--------------------------------
Which forwards played the most?
At 5v5
Hayes: 15:43
Laughton: 15:28
Giroux: 14:58
Couturier: 14:45
Obviously dumb. Do the stats back that up?
CF%
Hayes: 48.15
Laughton: 30.77
Giroux: 75.00
Couturier: 69.57
CF%rel
Hayes: -19.12
Laughton: -44.23
Giroux: 21.30
Couturier: 11.94
xGF%
Hayes: 46.01
Laughton: 18.63
Giroux: 83.98
Couturier: 69.87
xGF%rel
Hayes: -16.57
Laughton: -63.62
Giroux: 33.93
Couturier: 18.71
So what's my point here? That these are all things that 90% of this board could have said were terrible ideas before they even happened... and they went awful. The coaches can't keep screwing up like this because these should be layup decisions. If they cant get these right then how can anyone trust them to get tough decisions right?
They lost because Kuemper played extremely well and they happened to flub some great opportunities this time. No need to complicate this.
Not being the reason they lost is also no defense at all for icing 7D or Robert Hagg. It was terrible process, even if they won 8-1.
These are separate issues.
The Athletic said:But it was Voracek — obviously a key cog in a successful Philadelphia power play for years — who predictably provided the most incisive commentary regarding the PP’s struggles. His opinion?
“Obviously, when you play nine years (with the) same setup and the same kind of lineup, you know what to do,” Voracek said. “It’s like automatic, everything is automatic, you have three, four plays and you make them — whatever is open. When you’re shifting from one side to the other and trying to find the right combo, it’s kind of hard to get used to it. Sometimes that happens.”
.....
“I think in years past, all five guys had a job to do in a certain area of the ice when you were entering the zone,” he said. “Right now, I think it’s kind of … we’re not sure where to go 100 percent. And that’s I think the problem. You know, if one guy doesn’t go, the other guy has no idea what to do. We have to have better certainty on the power play, I think. That’s my opinion.”
What a ringing endorsement of the PP systems.
But supposedly it did work until Gordo came in and swapped the wings.What they're doing isn't working, but I'm not sure what they used to do would work anymore (it didn't last year).
The game has changed in terms of defending the PP, so their static setup probably had to be modified.
Just not this modification.
What a terrible hockey game to watch. Yuck.
Flyers dominated 5v5, but lost the special teams battle. Not sure what they can do to fix the PP - the forwards down low provide no value right now. I honestly can't even remember the last time JVR or anyone tipped the puck. It's all predictable perimeter play.
But hardly anyone was there to see it, so maybe it didn't happen.
Move on and beat Ottawa on Saturday.
Like, seriously. Don't freaking lose to Ottawa (who just shut down McJesus and the Leons).
Our coaches suck
Who was available that was better that wanted to come here? Q, who it seems didn't want to come here, isn't doing better in Florida and he got the top FA goalie.
At some point you need to look at other things. Luck and poor coaching can only be blamed for part of it when the metrics are still there that good things should be occuring.
Also it's fun to see people whining when this team is winning. Can you imagine if they had the Devils or Kings record? This team is 7th overall in the whole league.
PP lost us the game. Fire Therrien.
Missed the net or over-passed on too-many good looks all game.
Arizona played like some of the lesser-skilled Trap-Era Devils. Just ****ing hideous hockey. The type that turns fans away if anything. Not at all surprised they cant attract new fans despite playing better. Vomit-inducing.
Ekman-Larsson is a piece of garbage. He has been for years but its under the radar.
Ive never seen officials get in the ****ing way so much in my life. ****ing clowns.
What happened to the NHL getting tough on interference? Clutch and grab hockey is back.
What a ringing endorsement of the PP systems.