2023 MLB Thread

njdevils1982

Hell Toupée!!!
Sep 8, 2006
38,150
24,940
North of Toronto
The baseball rumor mill ran amok the past few days, before Ohtani himself posted on Instagram. Jon Morosi of MLB Network gave hope to Canada on Friday afternoon when he reported that Ohtani was on his way to Toronto, presumably to finalize a deal. Several outlets knocked down the report, then Morosi retracted it, writing on X,

“Today, I posted reporting that included inaccurate information that Shohei Ohtani was traveling to Toronto. I regret the mistake and apologize to baseball fans everywhere. I am deeply sorry for letting you down.”

source: Shohei Ohtani Will Sign the Biggest Deal in MLB History


...what a f***ing hack. who can take this guy seriously after this gaffe?

you either know or .... you just make up shit i guess :dunno:
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Jun 17, 2009
105,039
12,314
Connecticut
Yes but hearing it's heavily deferred to evade the luxury tax. I'm going to laugh if it's something like a 25 year payout. Baseball really needs to average out the salaries for the luxury tax because the Dodgers will still be in on Yamamoto if they are paying him something ridiculously low like $30M out of the $70 in the first X amount of years.

It would be sad but also kind of hilarious if Ohtani was this highly sought after, and then became the new Bobby Bonilla because of the deferred money clauses.
 

denverdevil

Registered User
Nov 13, 2007
1,770
1,663
Denver, CO
The baseball rumor mill ran amok the past few days, before Ohtani himself posted on Instagram. Jon Morosi of MLB Network gave hope to Canada on Friday afternoon when he reported that Ohtani was on his way to Toronto, presumably to finalize a deal. Several outlets knocked down the report, then Morosi retracted it, writing on X,

“Today, I posted reporting that included inaccurate information that Shohei Ohtani was traveling to Toronto. I regret the mistake and apologize to baseball fans everywhere. I am deeply sorry for letting you down.”

source: Shohei Ohtani Will Sign the Biggest Deal in MLB History


...what a f***ing hack. who can take this guy seriously after this gaffe?

you either know or .... you just make up shit i guess :dunno:
So much just completely wrong reports on Twitter. I'm just waiting for Passan on anything from now on.
 

JrFischer54

Registered User
Apr 4, 2017
10,268
4,010
Yes, but in this analogy, the Oilers are also broke because their owner died and the salary cap doesn't exist.

The Yankees are one of the few teams that can pay the market value for Soto in UFA. I guess the Padres figure they might as well get some assets for him while they can.
I don’t get it the padres still have a really solid team on paper. Keep him for the year instead of this chump change package.
 

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,778
10,545
I need someone to explain the benefit of this to me.
Partly helps because instead of counting 70 million against the cap it will count 40 something million a year (helps recruit other players) because of deferred money. He makes like 45 million a year from off the field stuff. So when he’s retired he will get 68 million a year for 10 years while trying to win a championship now.
 

TheUnseenHand

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
47,807
18,621
So it's cap circumvention? :laugh:

I'd want significantly more of that money up front if I were him. Yeah, he makes a lot of money, but that still feels like a risk on his part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJDevs26

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
20,249
35,142
So it's cap circumvention? :laugh:

I'd want significantly more of that money up front if I were him. Yeah, he makes a lot of money, but that still feels like a risk on his part.
Not very familiar with the MLB’s contract rules, but how is it a risk on his end? Curious to learn more about this.
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,105
48,393
NJ
So it's cap circumvention? :laugh:

I'd want significantly more of that money up front if I were him. Yeah, he makes a lot of money, but that still feels like a risk on his part.
He makes like 50 million a year from off the field stuff. I think he just wants the team to win. Suffering on that Angels team will do that to you.
 

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,778
10,545
So it's cap circumvention? :laugh:

I'd want significantly more of that money up front if I were him. Yeah, he makes a lot of money, but that still feels like a risk on his part.
It’s not a risk. He’s just pushing out the payments to a later time which probably got him more total money so his team can sign more players or another big player.
 

TheUnseenHand

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
47,807
18,621
I also read that if he did this to not be taxed in California for the 680 million.

Ah, that makes a lot of sense.

It’s not a risk. He’s just pushing out the payments to a later time which probably got him more total money so his team can sign more players or another big player.

It's a risk because money in your hands now is worth more than money in the future.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,396
31,703
So it's cap circumvention? :laugh:

I'd want significantly more of that money up front if I were him. Yeah, he makes a lot of money, but that still feels like a risk on his part.
It's not a risk, it's a long-term investment play...the kind Bobby Bonilla once made and the Mets have been killed on it ever since.
 

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,778
10,545
Ah, that makes a lot of sense.



It's a risk because money in your hands now is worth more than money in the future.
Perhaps winning actually means something to him (I don’t know lol). I would think that deferring the money 10+ years also got him a huge bump in overall contract value. Say he would’ve signed for 50 million a year and pushing it off got him 70 million and a deeper team? Who knows. Seemed like something was up when he signed for I believe double what the last largest contract was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheUnseenHand

TheUnseenHand

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
47,807
18,621
Perhaps winning actually means something to him (I don’t know lol). I would think that deferring the money 10+ years also got him a huge bump in overall contract value. Say he would’ve signed for 50 million a year and pushing it off got him 70 million and a deeper team? Who knows. Seemed like something was up when he signed for I believe double what the last largest contract was.

That actually makes a ton of sense as well. All that deferred money very likely bumped up the value of the contract overall.
 

Emperoreddy

Show Me What You Got!
Apr 13, 2010
130,431
75,973
New Jersey, Exit 16E
So it's cap circumvention? :laugh:

I'd want significantly more of that money up front if I were him. Yeah, he makes a lot of money, but that still feels like a risk on his part.

In a way. It's meant to keep the dodgers under the luxury tax which is basically a soft cap (you can go over it but you got to pay a tax)
 

MasterofGrond

No, I'm not serious.
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2009
16,764
10,552
Rochester, NY
Ohtani and the Dodgers would literally have both been better off if he had taken a $40M a season deal paid out normally (or even less than that depending on your market assumptions). The MLB doesn't discount deferrals enough for cap calculations, they discount them like a risk free rate, when that's obviously not right.

but that doesn't create headlines I guess so, whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

HBK27

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2005
13,578
13,868
Northern NJ
I need someone to explain the benefit of this to me.

As far as my understanding of all this - by deferring $680M without interest, it knocks the annual value applied to the Competitive Balance Tax to ~$46M per year over the 10-year span of the contract. That's because MLB uses a net present value calculation for luxury tax purposes and since the deferred payments are not gaining interest, the value is lower now.

One of the benefits for Ohtani is that by lowering the CBT rate and only paying him $2M in salary per year over the next 10 years, the Dodgers should be able to field a more competitive team around him. As others have already mentioned, there may also be significant tax advantages for him if he's no longer living in California when $680 of that $700M is paid out.

He's already probably filthy rich to begin with and collecting an estimated $50M per season in endorsements, so deferring such a large amount probably doesn't put a dent in his lifestyle.

Not very familiar with the MLB’s contract rules, but how is it a risk on his end? Curious to learn more about this.

There's really no risk on his end as the money is guaranteed. Also read somewhere that the Dodgers have to start setting parts of the deferred payments aside as soon as 2025, so there's no chance they can default on the payment.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad