World Cup: 2022 World Cup Qualifiers

Status
Not open for further replies.

bluesfan94

Registered User
Jan 7, 2008
31,076
8,264
St. Louis
Every situation is different and everyone has their biases but I struggle to understand how the standard wouldn't be war crimes.
I think the standard would be the forceful invasion of a previously peaceful nation. And if you want to make the comparison to Iraq, Israel, Libya, the Balkans, anywhere else, we can do that. I'm fine comparing taking out genocidal leaders vis-a-vis taking out a leader because he wants to be part of the EU and a defensive treaty alliance.
 

bluesfan94

Registered User
Jan 7, 2008
31,076
8,264
St. Louis
USA world lap the field. Twice. Even if the field was combined.
It depends on how you count Russia. If you count the USSR causing deaths in certain Soviet Republics (e.g. Hungary, Poland, Ukraine, Czech Republic, etc.) then Russia runs away with it, easily. I also don't understand how foreign deaths are the only ones that matter when talking about the last 80 years. There are plenty of examples of mass amounts of domestic deaths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mount Suribachi

Uncle Rotter

Registered User
May 11, 2010
5,976
1,039
Kelowna, B.C.
Here's another example of a double standard pointed out by El Salvador's president.
Imagine a country where demonstrators asking for a discussion with their employee (head of state is their employee) and they're answered with violence and freezing their bank accounts.
I can already see the westerners tweeting about this terrible act. Macron, Johnson, Biden and others arms in the air saying that country should be respectful about democracy.
But since it happened in Canada, it's all fine and dandy. Nobody uttered a word. Macron once said demonstrations shouldn't be met with violence in South America while doing the exact same thing in France.
That kind of hypocrisy is extremely tough to swallow for those countries, as Bukele pointed out.
You're in France? And you're calling that "violence"?
 

Evilo

Registered User
Mar 17, 2002
62,174
8,597
France
Damn, Adidas bans sellings in Russia of their tracksuits made by Ouighours.
That'll show them !

 

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
25,338
14,570
Montreal, QC
I think the standard would be the forceful invasion of a previously peaceful nation. And if you want to make the comparison to Iraq, Israel, Libya, the Balkans, anywhere else, we can do that. I'm fine comparing taking out genocidal leaders vis-a-vis taking out a leader because he wants to be part of the EU and a defensive treaty alliance.

This is completely absurd for reasons that can't be delved into without completely derailing this thread. Your biases are really showing and a godawful country like Saudi Arabia (and others) would be let completely off the hook. You must be borderline trolling at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Incubajerks

bluesfan94

Registered User
Jan 7, 2008
31,076
8,264
St. Louis
This is completely absurd for reasons that can't be delved into without completely derailing this thread. Your biases are really showing and a godawful country like Saudi Arabia (and others) would be let completely off the hook. You must be borderline trolling at this point.
That's kinda my point. It's a very high standard. We've seen that was KSA has done so far hasn't been worthy of a ban by FIFA/UEFA, so constructing a standard that includes that would be pretty silly.
 

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
25,338
14,570
Montreal, QC
That's kinda my point. It's a very high standard. We've seen that was KSA has done so far hasn't been worthy of a ban by FIFA/UEFA, so constructing a standard that includes that would be pretty silly.

That's why I'm advocating that there shouldn't really be a standard at this point. Be practical but outright banning nations is not something that should be considered, IMO.
 

bluesfan94

Registered User
Jan 7, 2008
31,076
8,264
St. Louis
That's why I'm advocating that there shouldn't really be a standard at this point. Be practical but outright banning nations is not something that should be considered, IMO.
I can see where you're coming from, but I disagree and I think we'll have to leave it at that. I think starting a war of this nature is something that should lead to isolation. And if the answer is that we use this standard going forward rather than saying look we didn't do it in the past, then fine. Just because there may have been mistakes in the past doesn't mean we shouldn't do the right thing in the future (or, more importantly, in the present).
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary69 and luiginb

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
25,338
14,570
Montreal, QC
I can see where you're coming from, but I disagree and I think we'll have to leave it at that. I think starting a war of this nature is something that should lead to isolation. And if the answer is that we use this standard going forward rather than saying look we didn't do it in the past, then fine. Just because there may have been mistakes in the past doesn't mean we shouldn't do the right thing in the future (or, more importantly, in the present).

I agree in spirit but I think this only really works if there'd be a way to have everyone start with a clean slate. That's obviously not possible when you're dealing with world affairs and various ongoing conflicts. Also, do we start considering internal oppression like North Korea, for example?
 

bluesfan94

Registered User
Jan 7, 2008
31,076
8,264
St. Louis
I agree in spirit but I think this only really works if there'd be a way to have everyone start with a clean slate. That's obviously not possible when you're dealing with world affairs and various ongoing conflicts. Also, do we start considering internal oppression like North Korea, for example?
Yeah, it's tough and it's also tough to balance out proxy wars. But I think we've seen proxy wars are different (see, e.g., the response to totally not Russia's first invasion of Ukraine). Same with domestic issues. I'm pretty sure South Africa was suspended because of apartheid, so there's certainly some precedent. But yeah, there's plenty of domestic issues that weren't met the same way.
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,382
19,230
w/ Renly's Peach
Is your point that because Russia is Russia, they shouldn't be punished?

The guy can't handle anyone disagreeing with him.

Right, but when there are blatant differences between situations, the standard is pretty evident. Like I said, there's plenty of room for nuance when discussing the different situations. Not everything is the same.

Yeah, I do. But I can't find the OECD data that 15,000 citizens due explicitly to Ukrainian shelling and you're being a little silly in terms of ignoring what happened in 2014 with Russia's unofficial invasion.

My point is to introduce standards that'll be applied consistently if we're going to start punishing NTs for the actions of their governments, and doing so requires recognizing the double standards that are applied to Russia.

If we're going to start drawing a line, let's figure out where it should go & draw that line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Havre and Evilo

bluesfan94

Registered User
Jan 7, 2008
31,076
8,264
St. Louis
My point is to introduce standards that'll be applied consistently if we're going to start punishing NTs for the actions of their governments, and doing so requires recognizing the double standards that are applied to Russia.

If we're going to start drawing a line, let's figure out where it should go & draw that line.
Right, but we can figure out where it goes without there being double standards. That's my only point. So defaulting to what aboutisms is pretty much just throwing out red herrings
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,382
19,230
w/ Renly's Peach
Right, but we can figure out where it goes without there being double standards. That's my only point. So defaulting to what aboutisms is pretty much just throwing out red herrings

Only if we recognize the biases that still exist, which have been responsible for those double standards in the past, and actively try to counter-act them moving forward. Otherwise, you're just making yourself feel better about perpetuating the status quo.
 

Scandale du Jour

JordanStaal#1Fan
Mar 11, 2002
62,238
28,953
Asbestos, Qc
www.angelfire.com
Here's another example of a double standard pointed out by El Salvador's president.
Imagine a country where demonstrators asking for a discussion with their employee (head of state is their employee) and they're answered with violence and freezing their bank accounts.
I can already see the westerners tweeting about this terrible act. Macron, Johnson, Biden and others arms in the air saying that country should be respectful about democracy.
But since it happened in Canada, it's all fine and dandy. Nobody uttered a word. Macron once said demonstrations shouldn't be met with violence in South America while doing the exact same thing in France.
That kind of hypocrisy is extremely tough to swallow for those countries, as Bukele pointed out.

What Canada did is freeze funds that were mostly built from donations from outside the country... a good portion of which came from very shady groups. I mean, I understand your point, but get your facts straight.

Also, the protest has been allowed to go on for a long time and policemen have took selfies with the protesters.

The narrative around the poor persecuted truckers is a false one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luiginb and cgf

Evilo

Registered User
Mar 17, 2002
62,174
8,597
France
What Canada did is freeze funds that were mostly built from donations from outside the country... a good portion of which came from very shady groups. I mean, I understand your point, but get your facts straight.

Also, the protest has been allowed to go on for a long time and policemen have took selfies with the protesters.

The narrative around the poor persecuted truckers is a false one.
No the narrative is that a leader of a "free country" is threatening his citizens to freeze their banks accounts, delete their permits, etc...
Shady donations my ass.
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,382
19,230
w/ Renly's Peach
No the narrative is that a leader of a "free country" is threatening his citizens to freeze their banks accounts, delete their permits, etc...
Shady donations my ass.

Canceling permits and freezing foreign funds coming into specific groups that are causing public disorder isn't exactly unheard of in democratic societies.

You can't have a society without people compromising on some "freedoms" :dunno:
 

Scandale du Jour

JordanStaal#1Fan
Mar 11, 2002
62,238
28,953
Asbestos, Qc
www.angelfire.com
No the narrative is that a leader of a "free country" is threatening his citizens to freeze their banks accounts, delete their permits, etc...
Shady donations my ass.

Sorry, but you have absolutely no f***ing idea what you are talking about.

Many of the leaders of those protests are well-known alt-right activists. The original movement was fine, the way it was recuperated by these groups is not. More than 65% of the donations they accumulated came from OUTSIDE the country. That is what was seized, the donations. Donations that, as I have said, came from a lot of shady sources.

I am not fan of the PM (hate his father even more), far from it, but you are just spewing garbage right now. The emergency measures would have been overkill, I agree. But acting like these protesters are "victims" is a joke.
 

Evilo

Registered User
Mar 17, 2002
62,174
8,597
France
Canceling permits and freezing foreign funds coming into specific groups that are causing public disorder isn't exactly unheard of in democratic societies.

You can't have a society without people compromising on some "freedoms" :dunno:
Public disorder needs to be defined here.
 

Evilo

Registered User
Mar 17, 2002
62,174
8,597
France
Sorry, but you have absolutely no f***ing idea what you are talking about.

Many of the leaders of those protests are well-known alt-right activists. The original movement was fine, the way it was recuperated by these groups is not. More than 65% of the donations they accumulated came from OUTSIDE the country. That is what was seized, the donations. Donations that, as I have said, came from a lot of shady sources.

I am not fan of the PM (hate his father even more), far from it, but you are just spewing garbage right now. The emergency measures would have been overkill, I agree. But acting like these protesters are "victims" is a joke.
Where have I talked about the victims?
You're making stuff up here.
I'm repeating that a leader of a free democratic country is using those threats on his own people.
I don't necessarily agree with the truckers here.

If a south American country was doing the same, Trudeau would point the finger. That's the hypocrisy I'm talking about here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad