Prospect Info: [2022 - 92nd] Adam Engstrom (SHL - Rogle BK)

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
77,705
125,723
Montreal
Dallas loans 1st Round Pick Lian Bichsel to Rogle. So chances are Engstrom will drop a spot in the LD hierarchy.

Not that Engstrom will no longer be a key piece for Rogle. But Bichsel will very likely take minutes from Engstrom.
 

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
77,705
125,723
Montreal
Engstrom better gtfo Bichsel

Looking at stats alone, Engstrom is having the same kind of production as William Wallinder did.

Wallinder was a 2nd round pick in 2020 by the Red Wings. Engstrom was a 2022 3rd round pick by the Habs.

First full years at Rogle:
Wallinder: 19 pts (4G, 15A) in 47 GP
Engstrom: 16 pts (6G, 10A) in 43 GP

Second year at Rogle:
Wallinder: 26 pts (7G, 19A) in 50 GP
Engstrom: currently on pace for 25 pts (5G, 20A) in 52 GP
 

skidcells

Registered User
May 11, 2023
320
642
Looking at stats alone, Engstrom is having the same kind of production as William Wallinder did.

Wallinder was a 2nd round pick in 2020 by the Red Wings. Engstrom was a 2022 3rd round pick by the Habs.

First full years at Rogle:
Wallinder: 19 pts (4G, 15A) in 47 GP
Engstrom: 16 pts (6G, 10A) in 43 GP

Second year at Rogle:
Wallinder: 26 pts (7G, 19A) in 50 GP
Engstrom: currently on pace for 25 pts (5G, 20A) in 52 GP
Wasn’t Wallliner selected 32nd overall? That would make him a first round pick in today’s 32 team nhl… my point is Wallinder was a really early second round pick (borderline first rounder).
 

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
77,705
125,723
Montreal
Wasn’t Wallliner selected 32nd overall? That would make him a first round pick in today’s 32 team nhl… my point is Wallinder was a really early second round pick (borderline first rounder).

Correct. But technically, he's a 2nd round pick. But yes, he's 32nd, so now he'd be considered a 1st rounder. But even as a 2nd rounder, he's the top pick in the 2nd round (similar to Beck being 33rd OA and being the first players selected in the 2nd round).

And Engstrom was taken like 6 picks before the 4th round, so he's closer to the 4th than he is the 2nd (had he been a high 3rd round pick).
 

DAChampion

Registered User
May 28, 2011
29,889
21,073
Looking at stats alone, Engstrom is having the same kind of production as William Wallinder did.

Wallinder was a 2nd round pick in 2020 by the Red Wings. Engstrom was a 2022 3rd round pick by the Habs.

First full years at Rogle:
Wallinder: 19 pts (4G, 15A) in 47 GP
Engstrom: 16 pts (6G, 10A) in 43 GP

Second year at Rogle:
Wallinder: 26 pts (7G, 19A) in 50 GP
Engstrom: currently on pace for 25 pts (5G, 20A) in 52 GP

Isn't that discouraging? Wallinder did slightly better than Engstron, and he isn't even good enough to play in the NHL for a weak team (Detroit) in his D+4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BehindTheTimes

Don D

Registered User
Oct 15, 2017
424
525
Looking at stats alone, Engstrom is having the same kind of production as William Wallinder did.

Wallinder was a 2nd round pick in 2020 by the Red Wings. Engstrom was a 2022 3rd round pick by the Habs.

First full years at Rogle:
Wallinder: 19 pts (4G, 15A) in 47 GP
Engstrom: 16 pts (6G, 10A) in 43 GP

Second year at Rogle:
Wallinder: 26 pts (7G, 19A) in 50 GP
Engstrom: currently on pace for 25 pts (5G, 20A) in 52 GP
Stats may be similar but;
Wallinder: 6'4", 192 LBS
Engstrom: 6", 168 LBS
I prefer Wallinder even though he may not be a physical guy despite his size advantage!
Detroit thought enough of Wallinder to sign him to a 3 yr contract back in March.
 

MD thaivuN

Anime Music Hipster
Aug 2, 2012
8,339
3,915
Montreal
www.youtube.com
Isn't that discouraging? Wallinder did slightly better than Engstron, and he isn't even good enough to play in the NHL for a weak team (Detroit) in his D+4.

The more positive way to look at it is that Engstrom, in his D+1 and D+2, is basically achieving what Wallinder did in his D+2 & D+3. He's practically a year ahead of Wallinder's curve.
 

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
10,439
10,708
Stats may be similar but;
Wallinder: 6'4", 192 LBS
Engstrom: 6", 168 LBS
I prefer Wallinder even though he may not be a physical guy despite his size advantage!
Detroit thought enough of Wallinder to sign him to a 3 yr contract back in March.
Gawd.....not this again.

Engstrom is 6'2" and at least 190 lbs. He is also an elite skater which you won't notice by only looking at Hockeydb stats.....
 

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
77,705
125,723
Montreal


Stats may be similar but;
Wallinder: 6'4", 192 LBS
Engstrom: 6", 168 LBS
I prefer Wallinder even though he may not be a physical guy despite his size advantage!
Detroit thought enough of Wallinder to sign him to a 3 yr contract back in March.

Engstrom is 6'2" and 190 lbs according to Elite Prospects.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Habs4Life and Don D

calder candidate

Registered User
Feb 25, 2003
4,797
2,717
Montreal
Visit site
The more positive way to look at it is that Engstrom, in his D+1 and D+2, is basically achieving what Wallinder did in his D+2 & D+3. He's practically a year ahead of Wallinder's curve.
Also If I remember correctly Wallinder wasn’t the fastest skater, especially going backwards or pivoting, which might be the biggest hurdle for him to translate to the NHL.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
57,735
41,047
www.youtube.com
That’s surprising, I only read praises about Rogle being a well-coached team doing a good development work with prospects. Maybe they didn’t win enough.

Well here’s your chance @WeThreeKings maybe (just maybe) the Rogle guys would be an upgrade over your favorite AHL coach :sarcasm:

it is surprising at least to me but they were having a bad year so I guess they aren't messing around over there. Will be interesting to see if the team turns it around. I haven't gotten to see too much of him this year but as long as he keeps getting top 4 TOI then I'm not concerned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrom

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad