bbfan419
Registered User
I would do it, but try to sub in Forbort or Reilly and keep Grizz.I'll try and guess the deal and I am sure I am way off Debrusk, Gryz, Studnika and or Steen + 2nd for Lindholm/Manson, Rakell and a 5th
I would do it, but try to sub in Forbort or Reilly and keep Grizz.I'll try and guess the deal and I am sure I am way off Debrusk, Gryz, Studnika and or Steen + 2nd for Lindholm/Manson, Rakell and a 5th
No offense, but I think this is garbage.
No team in the league could overcome the level of ineptitude you people heap on our defense. If our system was that amazing, so amazing that you could throw out "3 JAGS and a lucky to be 3rd pair Smurf" and be the best defensive team in the league, everyone would do it.
And while Bergeron is great, he plays primarily with McAvoy. Our other 3 centers all rate below average defensively and that's who the defense spends the majority of their time on the ice with.
When he first came over from Ottawa I was pleasantly surprised and even gave Sweeney his due ( hard for me to do ) that he pulled off a good . Come the Playoffs and I do not need stats I use my eyes and what I saw was not pretty and it has continued into this season .Mike Reilly had 4 points in 10 games, was +3 and played 21:29 in the playoffs last year.
He was on the ice for 123 shots for, and only 90 against. (Ratio is 2nd only to McAvoy)
He was on the ice for 33 high danger chances for, and only 21 against. (Ratio is 2nd only to McAvoy)
He may have had an awful game, but he didn't have an awful playoffs. I'm beating a dead horse with this, but the wheels fell off when Carlo and Miller went down. You can't ask Reilly to carry Clifton or Tinordi in the second pair. Or to be a primary penalty killer. He's not a #2 and isn't paid like one.
Also, for all you folks that are so focused on size and snarl, you seem to constantly ignore the impact losing Carlo and Miller had on our defense. If size and snarl are soooo important (and I agree they are) then why don't you acknowledge how much it hurt us? Instead you blame the guys left holding the bag, who were asked to play roles they're not suited for.
I suspect its more system than anything, though. Even Krug never had license to roam and create in the offensive zone at even strength. I think the Bruins trade offense from the blue line for preventing odd man rushes on purpose as part of their team defense strategy.
I agree , I would rather DeBrusk right now.........I'd rather have Debrusk. Unless the value is derived from Debrusk leaving after the season as a free agent vs Rakell signing an extension.
When he first came over from Ottawa I was pleasantly surprised and even gave Sweeney his due ( hard for me to do ) that he pulled off a good . Come the Playoffs and I do not need stats I use my eyes and what I saw was not pretty and it has continued into this season .
My book its have been pretty good not perfect but pretty good. Take a look at my history.You should get 5 “book it’s” a year.
My book its have been pretty good not perfect but pretty good. Take a look at my history.
If Vaak is going the other way, a good tell would be when he comes off IR
Still shake my head that tool Parros thought that hit was ok..Targetted hit all the way. Intent for sure to drive head into the glass.Anyhow hope here or elsewhere he never takes another hit like that.I am with you as I strongly think Vaak is going. In fact, if it wasn't for his most recent probable post-concussion problems I would
guarantee it.
Well I remember. Not many, but some were justifying letting him walk since Gryz would pick up some of the slack. Pp is where puck moving Dman get most of their pts. Gryz just doesn’t produce enough.I don't remember anyone saying that. People said he could replace his puck moving and was a better defender. I think both are true.
Also fwiw, Grzelcyk has as many ES points as Krug. He has the same amount of ES points per game over the last two years as well. Gryz has 6 ES goals in 88 games, Krug has 5 ES goals in 102 games.
The difference in their overall points is that Krug is on PP1 in STL and McAvoy is on PP1 here.
The taylor hall coming to Boston was one of my best. Ask anyone here. I'm a legend for it .It’s so much work to do though. You tell me your correct book it’s and I’ll consider it.
The taylor hall coming to Boston was one of my best. Ask anyone here. I'm a legend for it .
Sweeney and his pro scout department are horrible. They finally start drafting decent these past two years and now are going to most likely give up their top kids plus this years valuable first rounder. I don’t trust this guy. He can’t trade for crap.
No the Hall trade was done by Hall.
Sweeney and his pro scout department are horrible. They finally start drafting decent these past two years and now are going to most likely give up their top kids plus this years valuable first rounder. I don’t trust this guy. He can’t trade for crap.
No the Hall trade was done by Hall.
I am not a vaak fan. I think his ceiling is third pairing.
I posted this the other day...
1st, UV, DeBrusk and Reilly for Lindholm and Rakell.
When asked if Verbeek would consider moving Lindholm and Rakell while in a playoff hunt, he said, "Well, I can't lose them for nothing."
JDB and Reilly allow Anaheim to stay in the playoff hunt. They replace UFA's with guys under their control, and they get futures to help with the rebuild. What other team can offer them both roster players and futures?
Jimmy Murphy broke that one so it was a doozy of a dayThe taylor hall coming to Boston was one of my best. Ask anyone here. I'm a legend for it .
Didn't realize Hall negotiated for the Sabres in that deal.
The taylor hall coming to Boston was one of my best. Ask anyone here. I'm a legend for it .