Hertl makes sense because it’s a longterm addition that can also help now. Stastny doesn’t put this team over the top and is a 36 year old rental, what’s the point? The GM just spent a boat load of money in FA to service Bergeron and Marchand, now that it’s not enough we should burn all the future assets to maybe make it to a CF? I get that keeping Bergeron happy is important to entice him to return but to what extent?To me I feel that it would be a massive disservice to guys like Marchand and Bergeron if the Bruins were to decide to do nothing at the deadline. People keep worrying about Bergeron retiring and having no replacement for him but that’s exactly what’s going to happen if the Bruins decide to do nothing and not try and improve this team. If you can add a couple depth pieces you won’t have to worry about giving up anything significant and it could potentially improve the team drastically if the pieces fit.
Guys like Stasny aren’t the sexiest names being thrown around, but it gives the team the option to move a couple players down a few lines so that guys like Smith, Coyle, and Haula aren’t forced into roles they can’t fill. In addition to that you don’t end up paying a kings ransom like you most likely would have to pay for guys like Hertl/Giroux.
He’s going to add some rentals because he has to to make it look good but I wouldn’t go crazy with what you give up.
Last two drafts look good, development who knows but one way to make sure it never improves it by not drafting.I’m aware that you don’t want to waste any valuable futures for any rentals but what would be the point in keeping them since the majority of fans argue that this management group supposedly can’t draft or develop?