Couldn't height definitely be knock on development?
this isn't really apples to apples, but couldn't height be the main reason why Cole Caufield dropped to 15 last year? I saw him going around 10, and even one mock had him going in the top 10. He dropped to 15 with teams like Philly even passing on him twice.
We of course don't know what teams were thinking, but I bet more than 1 felt like his size would prevent him from impacting a NHL roster.
Cole Caufield still went in the top half, but I could see Rossi dropping to even 9 nine, since I think there are teams out there that fear his size will prevent him from being a center. I'm not saying they are right either though.
Goes back to my earlier question i asked in the thread for everyone, Does Rossi's stock drop in your eyes if you were told he is only going to be a wing in the NHL?
I don't disagree with any of this. However, nothing you said above has anything to do with your statement that claims "there is nothing out there that indicates that Rossi won't be a center at the NHL level".Yeah but they were not drafted as "likely" Wings They were drafted as centers and settled to wings. You dont avoid any better player cause you are afraid he won't develop into one before he even steps on the ice.
If Rossi was 5'9" 165lbs I'd agree with you that his size is a concern. But by all accounts he's built like a brick shit house.I don't disagree with any of this. However, nothing you said above has anything to do with your statement that claims "there is nothing out there that indicates that Rossi won't be a center at the NHL level".
Dismissing a players talent just because he is short or light is a terrible idea. Pretending that being short or light doesn't affect a players projection into the NHL is just as bad. I don't see anyone on this forum saying that he will never be an NHL player because of his height, but I do see quite a few saying that him being short doesn't mean anything.
I don't disagree with any of this. However, nothing you said above has anything to do with your statement that claims "there is nothing out there that indicates that Rossi won't be a center at the NHL level".
Dismissing a players talent just because he is short or light is a terrible idea. Pretending that being short or light doesn't affect a players projection into the NHL is just as bad. I don't see anyone on this forum saying that he will never be an NHL player because of his height, but I do see quite a few saying that him being short doesn't mean anything.
There are plenty of videos of the kid around. He's pretty tiny. Huge thighs that explain his strength on his skates but no upperbody.If Rossi was 5'9" 165lbs I'd agree with you that his size is a concern. But by all accounts he's built like a brick shit house.
Quality response.Lol comparing zucc to an 18 year old? Cmon.
There are plenty of videos of the kid around. He's pretty tiny. Huge thighs that explain his strength on his skates but no upperbody.
Look, I honestly hope that the Wild take him because that would mean that guys like Brackett and Fenton think he can be a 1st line player in the NHL. A guy that plays like Rossi being able to do those things in the NHL is exactly what the Wild need.
The funny thing is that Rossi has the exact same skill set as Zuccarello. Zuccarello may be the most disliked player on this board, yet this board now views Rossi as the saviour.
No not at all. Beyond height and weight (stretch) they share nothing close to similar which again is all youre grasping. One is fully developed and 32 Years old 2 inches shorter at 5'7 and never played center in his career. The other is 18, 5'9. weighs more and fun fact you don't stop growing at 18.Quality response.
Are they not similar in size? Similar in skill set? Play a similar style? What's so different about them that makes it a bad comparison?
I'm sure most expect or at least hope that Rossi will produce more offense than Zuccarello does, but he's going to playing exactly like Zuccarello does. You're also kidding yourself if you think Rossi at 18 is even close to as strong as Zuccarello is or near as good along the wall. He will be able to develop that part of his game to be better than Zuccarello, but it will never be a strength in the NHL.You are right there are some similarities between Rossi and zucc. Rossi is more physical and just on another level as far as offensive abilities go. If zucc could win 1 board battle in his career or learn to shoot the puck when he has a wide open chance i think a lot of people would like him more.
Perfetti, Raymond, Rossi ahead of Kaprizov. Holtz, Sanderson and Drysdale in between. Would Listen to an argument for Lundell and Jarvis ahead of BoldyHere might a fun game. Or at least a game. Might not be fun. If we assume that our top 2 prospects right now are Kaprizov and Boldy, in that order, which of the names from 4 to 9+ (basically anybody after Laf, Byfield and Stutzle) would you put ahead of Kaprizov, if any? Which would you put between them? Which would you put behind Boldy?
It’s so cool how you know exactly how a prospect is going to turn outI'm sure most expect or at least hope that Rossi will produce more offense than Zuccarello does, but he's going to playing exactly like Zuccarello does. You're also kidding yourself if you think Rossi at 18 is even close to as strong as Zuccarello is or near as good along the wall. He will be able to develop that part of his game to be better than Zuccarello, but it will never be a strength in the NHL.
You really think it takes anything more than common sense to know that a 5'9 hockey player will never be a power forward in the NHL? Rossi could end up a 100 point 1st line center for all I know, but I can still guarantee that he won't become that player by dumping pucks into the corner and going in crashing on the forecheck.It’s so cool how you know exactly how a prospect is going to turn out
Good thing thats not what we need. I like that 100pt center talk though. Its almost as if you should gamble on that with the 9th if possible...but I can still guarantee that he won't become that player by dumping pucks into the corner and going in crashing on the forecheck.
I'm sure most expect or at least hope that Rossi will produce more offense than Zuccarello does, but he's going to playing exactly like Zuccarello does. You're also kidding yourself if you think Rossi at 18 is even close to as strong as Zuccarello is or near as good along the wall. He will be able to develop that part of his game to be better than Zuccarello, but it will never be a strength in the NHL.
I guess I’m just picky then as if it was a question it should need proper punctuation to be understood.You misunderstand that sentence, it's a question, not linked to the board battle thing.
It's impressive how people have such a short memory on Boldy.Perfetti, Raymond, Rossi ahead of Kaprizov. Holtz, Sanderson and Drysdale in between. Would Listen to an argument for Lundell and Jarvis ahead of Boldy
What do you think is significantly different between the way that Rossi and Zuccarello play the game?I dunno man, I feel like you might have to go back to some film on Rossi. What you just described isn't him.