JrFischer54
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2017
- 10,276
- 4,014
Say they do 24 team playoff. Your the 24th ranked team and you win the cup somehow. Do you still consider it a legit win?
Say they do 24 team playoff. Your the 24th ranked team and you win the cup somehow. Do you still consider it a legit win?
100%.
Not sure why anyone wouldn't tbh
New hype reel for Anton Lundell enjoy guys
Let me know what you think! Lundell is one of my fav's from this draft but his most valuable plays fly under the radar.
100%.
Not sure why anyone wouldn't tbh
To me it would.The more I see of Lundell the more I’m hoping he is there at our Arizona pick. I think Rossi/Drysdale would be gone at our pick at #6. Holtz seems like a natural fit, RW sniper which we need. Raymond looks like more of a play maker and passer.
Would Holtz at 6 and Lundell at 10 and best available D at #17 be a disappointment?
I would be pretty disappointed if that’s how it went down but I would still support our picks.The more I see of Lundell the more I’m hoping he is there at our Arizona pick. I think Rossi/Drysdale would be gone at our pick at #6. Holtz seems like a natural fit, RW sniper which we need. Raymond looks like more of a play maker and passer.
Would Holtz at 6 and Lundell at 10 and best available D at #17 be a disappointment?
Keep Cory and re-sign Louis.We should just get rid of everyone and everything and guarantee ourselves the first pick in the 2022 draft
Keep Cory and re-sign Louis.
Bring back Nas and try to get Hynes back too!
To me it would.
I think there is a top 6 that excludes Hotlz. I'd prefer Raymond over both Rossi and Drysdale so if he is there, we should take him IMO. If not, one of Rossi and Drysdale should be there.
Lundell doesn't seem to have the offensive potential of a typical top 10 pick and is safer. I'd prefer to go for someone who has higher end talent.
If Drysdale and Rossi are both there at #6 and we decide to take Raymond, I’ll be very disappointed.
And as for Lundell at #10, like you said, it wouldn’t be a bad pick but the way I see it, you can’t go with safe when you’re picking in the 1st round, let alone the top #10. We have a golden opportunity to hit two home runs with picks #6 and #10, so let’s not f*** this up, please.
NHLdraft 2020, has the Sens taking Sanderson at 2 and with our 17th pick the Devils take Helge Grans, Swedish defensemen.
At 6, it’s Stutzle and Holtz at 10.
I'd prefer Raymond over both. He reminds me of Barzal.If Drysdale and Rossi are both there at #6 and we decide to take Raymond, I’ll be very disappointed.
And as for Lundell at #10, like you said, it wouldn’t be a bad pick but the way I see it, you can’t go with safe when you’re picking in the 1st round, let alone the top #10. We have a golden opportunity to hit two home runs with picks #6 and #10, so let’s not f*** this up, please.
I'd personally rather take Askarov at 10 than Lundell. Rossi/Drysdale at 6 is perfect, though. We have a cupboard full of good prospects without star potential. Use this draft to swing for the fences.
I'd prefer Raymond over both. He reminds me of Barzal.
Kid has a ton of skill and I think he'd be a great winger for Nico or Hughes.
Holtz would address a big need for a goal scorer with some size. If you are drafting BPA and you feel Raymond Rossi or Perfetti are there and age potential to be an offensive dynamo over Holtz with their playmaking than you take them I suppose.
You think Holtz makes it to 10? Not saying Sanderson does but that opens things up a bit.NHLdraft 2020, has the Sens taking Sanderson at 2 and with our 17th pick the Devils take Helge Grans, Swedish defensemen.
At 6, it’s Stutzle and Holtz at 10.