NJDevs26
Once upon a time...
- Mar 21, 2007
- 67,437
- 31,775
A deal, WTF is this???
So Broncos were forced to play with no QB's as they were ruled ineligible ,,,,, But NFL cuts deal with Skins to allow Haskins to play/practice after violating protocol
WTF
Also this was 2nd time this year he violated protocols
How? He should be away from the facility until he has consecutive days of negative test results. I mean they benched the entire QB group for Denver when they were in a room together without a mask for a while. But Haskins is allowed to return while hanging out with people with no mask that have not been regularly tested?
what????
But another difference is that they only know because they get tested. No one can say that those Haskins was with didn’t have it one way or another.Well the one difference is they were in a room together without a mask with a guy who was confirmed positive soon after. Haskins, they have factual deniability because there's no evidence (yet) he was with anyone that had the virus. But yeah this smacks of them making an example of a bad team while letting playoff contenders slide on the letter of the law.
At the very least Haskins himself should be suspended for multiple violations.
Allen is out. Smith hurt his leg. Haskins is an idiot. Who else do they have on the PS to promote?
so because WFT is in a playoff spot their QB gets to play while Denver who wasn’t a playoff team gets screwed?
I’m all for what the nfl did to Denver but they need to be consistent with the penalty
A deal, WTF is this???
Haskins didn't test positive nor be deemed a close contact. That obviously could change.Allen is out. Smith hurt his leg. Haskins is an idiot. Who else do they have on the PS to promote?
so because WFT is in a playoff spot their QB gets to play while Denver who wasn’t a playoff team gets screwed?
I’m all for what the nfl did to Denver but they need to be consistent with the penalty
Would be insane if the lions won without coaches. LolThis is the Folgers commercial of NFL coaching. Let's replace these bad coaches with a discount brand of coaches and see if anyone can tell the difference.
The replies on this thread lmao
The NFL refused to move the game to a Sunday kickoff when all coaches would be available. Not a Lions fan but WFT? Bend over backwards numerous times to help Baltimore. But they say they don’t play favorites and the rules are the same for everyone.
Yup. Sure.
This is the Folgers commercial of NFL coaching. Let's replace these bad coaches with a discount brand of coaches and see if anyone can tell the difference.
To be fair this is a consistent enforcement of the rules. The problem is fans simply not understanding the rules.The NFL refused to move the game to a Sunday kickoff when all coaches would be available. Not a Lions fan but WFT? Bend over backwards numerous times to help Baltimore. But they say they don’t play favorites and the rules are the same for everyone.
Yup. Sure.
Right. If the risk is contained, the risk can be addressed. The Raven had an ongoing outbreak, so the game kept getting pushed back while we waited to see the outbreak contained.The Ravens had the same problem the Titans did which was too many people testing positive and they had to get it to stop before they could play the game because you don't know who is positive until they test for it.
The Lions have the same problem the Broncos did in that they were identified as close contacts to a positive test. The NFL has been consistent that they aren't postponing games for competitive reasons, only medical.
I fully support this. I hate the tank culture.
I wonder if that was not Marrone's choice. You would think he'll be fired at year's end so he gains nothing from tanking. This shows there are indeed ways to tank without depending on players to purposely play badly. Flacco should have been starting for the Jets.