Vachon23
Registered User
Now that we have a solid backup we can concentrate on the 3 others part that we need to improve
- Goal scoring winger
- Size
- A good LD
- Goal scoring winger
- Size
- A good LD
Now that we have a solid backup we can concentrate on the 3 others part that we need to improve
- Goal scoring winger
- Size
- A good LD
That's how I see it too.
And thankfully, it's a feasible challenge for the Bergevin administration, and if they pull it off, Habs will be in a position to compete.
Mantha is the wet dream.
Not sure if something like Domi + Poehling + 2nd rounder(s) moves the needle though.
It’s gonna be tough getting both, godspeed Marc lol
So... if we sign Mete 2.5M per season (can't imagine him getting much more than this), and Evans 900K, it leaves us with 10.5M to play with and only Domi to sign.
so we can realistically trade Domi for a 4MD and have 6M to spend on a winger... Or we could trade Domi for futures and have a healthy run at one of the wingers on the UFA market.
Still many possibilities.
I have all 3 of Mete, Juulsen, and Evans getting around $800k on one way contracts. Why do you think Mete gets $2.5M?
Mete is not getting an AHL-level contract after playing in the NHL for three seasons. 2.5M is an absolute worst-case scenario in my opinion. He likely gets the same kind of deal as Kulak, maybe with less terms.
Nah... you got that wrong. Go look at what Beaulieu got after his ELC. It's not a AHL contract. It's a one way NHL contract. $7000 vs $700 a game is a big difference for guys like Mete, Juulsen, and Evans.
Mete has no leverage here
How many game had Beaulieu played in the NHL after his ELC? He had all of 11 points in 81 games. Mete has 31 points and played more than twice the amount of games (171). Much more proven as a player, doesn't have all the attitude/behavior issues Beaulieu had, and Beaulieu still had a 1 millions $ deal. Plus, the cap is now higher than it was back then, and 3rd pairing D all fetch 3M+ on the UFA market nowadays.
Mete is certainly getting more than 1.5M / season. 2.5M is stretching it but it's always how I predict future lineups. By overpaying unsigned players rather than going with wishful salaries.
Now that we have a solid backup we can concentrate on the 3 others part that we need to improve
- Goal scoring winger
- Size
- A good LD
Around 13.5M to play with; let's say 11.5M after signing Mete. You need to keep a couple of millions to fill the lineup. I see two possibilities: We fix the wing and size, or the LHD and Size.
LHD + Size:
Deal involving Domi and Brodin: 7M available.
Signing a 4th line winger with size/grit: 5.5M available.
Scoring + Size:
Dealing Domi for futures: 11.5M available
Signing a 4th line winger with size/grit: 10M available
Signing Dadonov to a 3 years contract: 4.5M available
Unless you go for plan A and actually bring back Kovalchuk for 2M + bonuses?
I don't think Mete will be back but you still have alote of $$ and don't forget that Alzner contract won't be there to. Byron can be traded to if we really miss $$ what I don't think will happen
View attachment 365471
That's a lineup I would most definitely be comfortable with. Granlund has tons of upside despite a subpar season with Nashville. Hartman would add some much-needed jam to the 4th line. And Brodin would really solidify that D-core. That lineup has 23 players and is still 1.1M under the salary cap. Once again, in no way is it a Stanley Cup contender on paper, but this is a deep team that is definitely playoffs material.
The only trade that was done was Domi and a 2nd round pick for Brodin and Hartman. I would not mind adding Mete to that package if that's what it takes.