Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,347
- 31,519
You are talking bout one of the last vestiges of Victorianism that has gotten even more unegalitarian. They have their farcical justification for slave labor and they will fight tooth and nail to keep it.
You are talking bout one of the last vestiges of Victorianism that has gotten even more unegalitarian. They have their farcical justification for slave labor and they will fight tooth and nail to keep it.
You're up against this kind of ignorance and obstinate though:I see what you're saying. There should be a way to put pressure on them to change some of these dumb rules though. There just isn't enough will by those who can, probably due to fear of retaliation.
So they just continue making massive profits, while not paying athletes, preventing them from going to pro training camps, preventing them from playing in the AHL, and even preventing them from playing in a junior league during a pandemic when the NCAA is shut down, because they offer a stipend to their athletes.
I don’t know how you could make them change their eligibility rules unless they were discriminatory (they are not to my knowledge). Nobody forces you to play NCAA, there are plenty of other options. They would change their rules only if they could no longer attract top athletes.I see what you're saying. There should be a way to put pressure on them to change some of these dumb rules though. There just isn't enough will by those who can, probably due to fear of retaliation.
So they just continue making massive profits, while not paying athletes, preventing them from going to pro training camps, preventing them from playing in the AHL, and even preventing them from playing in a junior league during a pandemic when the NCAA is shut down, because they offer a stipend to their athletes.
You're up against this kind of ignorance and obstinate though:
Just think about the state of higher education in the South without college football.Unbelievable these people. I'm sure none of the major universities down south lobbied him heavily to take that stance either.
Just think about the state of higher education in the South without college football.
I just don't understand why there's a ridiculous rule that they full-on lose their entire eligibility before hand. I mean majority of these athletes probably work on campus for their school and get money for their labour. I get it that you can't join the NCAA if you signed that year for a WHL team as you're getting paid, but holy eff why can't that player then sign for a school the following year? It just makes zero sense whatsoever that they're "deemed" a professional making 300 odd bucks a month playing against 18 year olds.Is there no regulating body that can slap the NCAA around for considering the WHL a pro league?
The WHL stipend is about $250-600 a month. That pales in comparison to what the NCAA gives their "student athletes" and considering these junior athletes work at least full time for them, that breaks down to a whopping $1.56 - 3.75/hr.
All of these leagues are making millions off these young kids risking their health and career for them, while being financially compensated either nothing or almost nothing.
It would appear so
I so hate this line of thinking. These guys aren't being taken advantage of as badly as everyone would like to have you to believe. They do get paid, a lot. They get hundreds of thousands in scholarship funds, team gear, food, room and board, medical care, tutoring, and now they get paid for Name, Image, and Likeness. I'd say that's pretty good for 18-20-year-old kids. I got none of that when I went to college, as does 90% of the rest of the kids that go to College. No one is forcing them to go to college to play. They want to quit and go play Juniors, where they get paid peanuts and have to fend for themselves, I'm sure they can, but I'm so sick of hearing about how these poor athletes, that get to live off their colleges for free, are being taken advantage of.I see what you're saying. There should be a way to put pressure on them to change some of these dumb rules though. There just isn't enough will by those who can, probably due to fear of retaliation.
So they just continue making massive profits, while not paying athletes, preventing them from going to pro training camps, preventing them from playing in the AHL, and even preventing them from playing in a junior league during a pandemic when the NCAA is shut down, because they offer a stipend to their athletes.
That's false. Because of Title IX they pay millions every year to give opportunities to people in non-revenue sports. The only sports that make any money are football and basketball and in a few instances (depending on the school and fan base) volleyball, baseball, and hockey. There are very few athletic programs that make any money, and the ones that do have large and successful football programs. And now, with what's happened this year with COVID, most are losing millions and are having to cut jobs and athletic programs (all men's sports because you can't cut women's and have less # of scholarships for women than men because of Title IX).I know that's what I mean. You're more up on this than I am so I'm preaching to the choir. A lot of those universities just outright lie that they don't make a profit too, by drastically overstating what they "spend" on scholarships. Then politicians just repeat the lie and give them cover to keep doing business as is.
A University accounting department could claim that each scholarship is worth $50k or so, and then claim they're spending $5-10 million on scholarships, so they're not turning a profit. But they're not actually spending anywhere near that much money on their athletes room and board etc, and they're not turning paying students away because of them.
There's very few schools that are financially or otherwise constrained to the point where they have to turn down paying students based on the scholarships they sign.
I so hate this line of thinking. These guys aren't being taken advantage of as badly as everyone would like to have you to believe. They do get paid, a lot. They get hundreds of thousands in scholarship funds, team gear, food, room and board, medical care, tutoring, and now they get paid for Name, Image, and Likeness. I'd say that's pretty good for 18-20-year-old kids. I got none of that when I went to college, as does 90% of the rest of the kids that go to College. No one is forcing them to go to college to play. They want to quit and go play Juniors, where they get paid peanuts and have to fend for themselves, I'm sure they can, but I'm so sick of hearing about how these poor athletes, that get to live off their colleges for free, are being taken advantage of.
That's false. Because of Title IX they pay millions every year to give opportunities to people in non-revenue sports. The only sports that make any money are football and basketball and in a few instances (depending on the school and fan base) volleyball, baseball, and hockey. There are very few athletic programs that make any money, and the ones that do have large and successful football programs. And now, with what's happened this year with COVID, most are losing millions and are having to cut jobs and athletic programs (all men's sports because you can't cut women's and have less # of scholarships for women than men because of Title IX).
Pronman is always a grain of salt type guy but I do not agree with how these org rankings turned out.Damn, Pronman has the Rags #1 in prospect rankings before getting Laf. That's a bit ridiculous.
Pronman: 2020-21 NHL organizational rankings
What's even more ridiculous is how they are there despite the Kravstov and Lias Anderson early first round picks.
Eurolanche is saying the deal is for Kaut to play until the new season.
Also, by mother team, I think they meant home town team.
The NCAA clearly doesn’t see an issue with diminishing their talent pool and prefers to have the control that they do holding kids hostage over it.I just don't understand why there's a ridiculous rule that they full-on lose their entire eligibility before hand. I mean majority of these athletes probably work on campus for their school and get money for their labour. I get it that you can't join the NCAA if you signed that year for a WHL team as you're getting paid, but holy eff why can't that player then sign for a school the following year? It just makes zero sense whatsoever that they're "deemed" a professional making 300 odd bucks a month playing against 18 year olds.
There's no thread to post this so I'm posting it here... some kid in the Q came out of the closet this week. I don't know if it happened before.