Last edited:
That assumes Gryz will be the one Seattle takes. They could for sure, but who knows what they will want and need? There are so many variables in the mix here, especially several months out ahead of the draft. And then again, Seattle could be bought off to take a certain player without it costing an arm and a leg. I'd rather roll with Hanifin (should he come) and Grizz on the left this season than lose Grizz and make the same type of hole we just filled with Hanifin. Let the draft take care of itself.
Right , so shouldn't you then trade Grizz clearing the Cap space and getting back assets before you lose him to Seattle.
They'd be nuts not to take Grizz, even if he doesn't fit in with their plans they take him and then flip him. He'll be the best asset the Bruins will have available. What are you going to give them to dissuade them from taking Grizz? It has to be an asset as good or better than Grizz otherwise they'd be nuts to take it.
just one example
lauzon + 1st/2nd
Grzelyck
which would you rather have? I’m leaning towards the former.
You didn't have those guys in your lineup. Yeah, they'll be much tougher if they go that route. Problem is our coach seems to hate any form of physical play. I think you're selling Chara short at 99%. I'd say it's 100 still.You think a full year of Ritchie and Lauzon, getting Miller back, Frederic and Zboril making the team makes them softer? The only tough player vacating the roster is Chara, who while tougher than 99 percent of the league today, his playing days are coming to a close.
I'd like Cam to brush his teeth and tuck him in at night if it will help. I loved the trade at the time and still do. I agree that he is a third liner (with Coyle and Bennett, btw)I’ve always liked him
he turned 25 this month !!!! Have him in great condition and have skating coach work on his first couple of steps
put him on third line LW and power play and he will do great
he’s a excellent athlete beyond hockey
I can’t believe people want to toss him in the trash
I’d love to see Neely work with him as well
other then Gordie Howe the vintage healthy Cam Neely was the ultimate combo of skills and toughness
If I’m Neely I’m having Ritchie as a pet project
if Ritchie is a 15+ third liner that’s a major plus - I think he can be better than that
Third line third wheel with Coyle & Smith is fine - that line 650-675 lbs
Danton Heinen types unless they are good enough to play in top 6 I don’t want them on my bottom 6
Cant believe at 24 years old some are so quick to pronounce him a bust
You didn't have those guys in your lineup. Yeah, they'll be much tougher if they go that route. Problem is our coach seems to hate any form of physical play. I think you're selling Chara short at 99%. I'd say it's 100 still.
You’d think after 5 or 6 years of not having one they’d have drafted another top 6 winger to play with Krejci by accident by now. At this point the odds of it not happening seem greaterI think a lot of the players that we all want to see in the lineup internally from Providence have a lot to prove before penciling them in as everyday players. I think there's going to be quite a few revolving doors at certain positions until the cream rises ( if it even does ).
I would make the deal for Hanifin . I would protect Hanifin, McAvoy, Carlo after that I could give a shit who gets claimed by Seattle. But a deal with a Calgary isn’t happening so it’s a moot point.They'd be nuts not to take Grizz, even if he doesn't fit in with their plans they take him and then flip him. He'll be the best asset the Bruins will have available. What are you going to give them to dissuade them from taking Grizz? It has to be an asset as good or better than Grizz otherwise they'd be nuts to take it.
That won’t get it done. Maybe Kase and one of the bruins young D and a second rd pk . Just being truthful with myself that probably won’t do it either. It would start with Debrusk or Grizz. If it’s Debrusk , I would sign Hoffman ASAP. If it was Grizz I would bring back Chara so I could cover myself . I don’t even think that would work cap wise but something along them lines.Kase and a small add.
I only lose Grizz if they got Hanifin . If one of JL, Clifton,UV play lights out they will lose one of them. With Grizz you know what you got. That is why making Debrusk the centerpiece of the deal and squeezing Hoffman in is a deal for the future and now. How bout this , break up the first line and move PB on the second line with him. If Marchand and Pasta aren’t ready for the season it will be like that anyway. It’s what a little over a 50 game season anyway .They need a fast start.. every game will be importantNo brainer for me , I'll keep Lauzon and the picks.
I'd try to trade Grizz in a package deal for a top pairing D. I don't see Grizz as a top pairing D for an entire season especially one that is going to played at the pace this season will. Then Seattle can choose some one like Lauzon and I don't have to throw in a 1st as well.
Clifton and Urho don't need to be protected.I only lose Grizz if they got Hanifin . If one of JL, Clifton,UV play lights out they will lose one of them.
Clifton and Urho don't need to be protected.
Clifton needs protecting, Vaak does not.
What everyone seems to be forgetting is that you HAVE TO EXPOSE 1 defenceman that has played in 40 games during the 2020/2021 season or 70 games over 2019/2020 and 2020/2021.
Right now only Carlo, McAvoy and Gryz meet that.
Clifton needs to play 31, while Moore, Lauzon, Kampfer, Zboril and Miller need to play 40 to meet exposure requirements. They can still be chosen by Seattle, but one has to be made available that meets the criteria.
Unless the NHL, Seattle and the PA reach an agreement to somehow prorate everything, that's what you are dealing with.
Assuming nothing changes then yes, all is good. Unless Chara officially retires before the draft.And if Chara comes back on a one year deal it’s all good, right?
They'd be nuts not to take Grizz, even if he doesn't fit in with their plans they take him and then flip him. He'll be the best asset the Bruins will have available. What are you going to give them to dissuade them from taking Grizz? It has to be an asset as good or better than Grizz otherwise they'd be nuts to take it.
I like Gryz and see his value and importance but I agree with you on Lauzon. I think he puts together a season where Sweeney and the brass will have to have very detailed conversations about which D is the 3rd one they protect. I don’t see them going the 4-4-1 protection option.People are jumping the gun on Gryz. The Bruins have used him as a third pairing defenseman to this point, so how would Seattle be nuts not to take him? I like Gryz but we are going to find out a lot about him this year with Krug and Chara (most likely?) gone. There is a lot left to be determined on the player.
Personally, I think Lauzon jumps him in importance by the end of the season. I'm higher on Lauzon than most, and I'm putting more stock in what I saw in Lauzon before the bubble than during the bubble.
What about Gryz + Kase + Kuhlman + 3rd rd pick for Hanifin + Bennett ?That won’t get it done. Maybe Kase and one of the bruins young D and a second rd pk . Just being truthful with myself that probably won’t do it either. It would start with Debrusk or Grizz. If it’s Debrusk , I would sign Hoffman ASAP. If it was Grizz I would bring back Chara so I could cover myself . I don’t even think that would work cap wise but something along them lines.