It’s always someone else’s fault. Hakstol. AMac. Flanders. God.
Bad coach - Ghost seems to struggle.
Interim coach - Ghost "magically" improves.
Permanent coach (who knows how to use skilled players and actually change-up the look of the freaking power play when opposing teams over-weight their coverage of Ghost and G) - Ghost improves a lot and his cap hit looks like a bargain again.
Why do you ignore that since Gordon has taken over, Ghost has played well overall??It’s always someone else’s fault. Hakstol. AMac. Flanders. God.
It’s always someone else’s fault. Hakstol. AMac. Flanders. God.
He hasn’t. Hence why 2 of the last 3 games he’s played only 11 & 12 minutes.Why do you ignore that since Gordon has taken over, Ghost has played well overall??
And I say overall, because yes he has had bad games, or periods, like every other player in the world. But you can't deny the difference in stats between coaches.
Or is this going to be another example of you ignoring the obvious?
He hasn’t. Hence why 2 of the last 3 games he’s played only 11 & 12 minutes.
So the article in the previous thread says that the Bruins, Lightning, Preds and Jets are in on Simmonds. What would we be expecting back from each of those teams?
I have convinced myself Chuck is keeping simmer. Because the flyers can't have nice things.So the article in the previous thread says that the Bruins, Lightning, Preds and Jets are in on Simmonds. What would we be expecting back from each of those teams?
I expect something like a 3rd that bumps to a 2nd if they re-sign him (which they won't) + a B prospect. I'd be overjoyed if we got a late 1st.So the article in the previous thread says that the Bruins, Lightning, Preds and Jets are in on Simmonds. What would we be expecting back from each of those teams?
So the article in the previous thread says that the Bruins, Lightning, Preds and Jets are in on Simmonds. What would we be expecting back from each of those teams?
If there's actually that much competition (especially among two pairs of divisional rivals) I can see the price moving up to a 2nd.
So to verify, you would like to go on record saying ice time determines if a player if playing well or not, correct?He hasn’t. Hence why 2 of the last 3 games he’s played only 11 & 12 minutes.
LSo to verify, you would like to go on record saying ice time determines if a player if playing well or not, correct?
What I said didn’t require any rephrasing; the only purpose of your doing so was to (quite transparently) make it into something I didn’t say.So to verify, you would like to go on record saying ice time determines if a player if playing well or not, correct?
It’s always someone else’s fault. Hakstol. AMac. Flanders. God.
So to verify, you would like to go on record saying ice time determines if a player if playing well or not, correct?