If people are really bothered with how he does against junior aged competition, they only have to watch his U20s. Where he was stellar. (All his games are on YT)Even moreso when he totally dominated the Slovaks in their first encounters.
I'm glad you brought that up. In this tourny he has not lived up to the hype.He's looked terrible at the u18s in general, especially defensively.
That's one way of looking at it. He had a bad week. Another way is that he was exposed by stiffer competition. Who knows the truth? That's why the scouts get paid the measly bucks, to make difficult decisions.He’s not my favourite either but you can’t don’t one a guy because of one bad 1 week tournament
Are we going to pretend that the u-18 is better competition than his play in Liiga or the WJC? He was excellent all year and had a rough tournament with a Finnish team that got completely dominated.That's one way of looking at it. He had a bad week. Another way is that he was exposed by stiffer competition. That's why the scouts get paid the measly bucks, to make difficult decisions.
That's not what I said. I presented two ways of looking at what has happened. I didn't state which one I thought was the case. I don't consider myself a scout.Are we going to pretend that the u-18 is better competition than his play in Liiga or the WJC? He was excellent all year and had a rough tournament with a Finnish team that got completely dominated.
I'm saying that's not really a way of looking at it. He performed better all year against better competition.That's not what I said. I presented two ways of looking at what has happened. I didn't state which one I thought was the case. I don't consider myself a scout.
Older competition. Not necessarily better.I'm saying that's not really a way of looking at it. He performed better all year against better competition.
Older competition. Not necessarily better.
I'm glad you brought that up. In this tourny he has not lived up to the hype.
Older competition. Not necessarily better.
Stiffer competition??? He was literally the best player on the ice in the liiga playoffs Jesus christ.That's one way of looking at it. He had a bad week. Another way is that he was exposed by stiffer competition. Who knows the truth? That's why the scouts get paid the measly bucks, to make difficult decisions.
Or MB/TT don’t assume they are smarter than all those other GMs/scouts that are passingIf Podkolzin falls to 15, you pick him and you run out of the building.
Anybody remember how Tarasenko was ranked prior to his draft? Was he ever considered top 3-5 but actually fell to 16.
I know KHL threat was peaking back then..
Jeez this mock is terrible
Stiffer competition??? He was literally the best player on the ice in the liiga playoffs Jesus christ.
If Juolevi and Maata could QB a PP and pass like Markov, maybe.Mrb1p....making excuses for Heinola's
average play.... he's another Olli Matta and Joelivi...just accept it.
Can you back up any of your claims with anything other than him having a subpar tournament?Mrb1p....making excuses for Heinola's
average play.... he's another Olli Matta and Joelivi...just accept it.
Why didnt he mock Turcotte to Chicago? York to Anaheim?Lmao, Lavoie to the habs. I don't even hate the pick but just...why always us?
Or MB/TT don’t assume they are smarter than all those other GMs/scouts that are passing
Very underwhelming tourney against his peers so far while a bunch of others have stepped up could push him out
I’d rather take someone rising than someone dropping like a rock
If Juolevi and Maata could QB a PP and pass like Markov, maybe.
Do you know why Collberg was ranked so high?Agreed... remember Sebastian Colberg....ranked 11th....he fell like a rock...we picked him as a early second rounder....big mistake...he nevera amounted to anything.
Do you know why Collberg was ranked so high?
Drumroll
He was good at an international tournament.