Kevin27NYI
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2009
- 19,788
- 5,852
I couldn't find anything online, anyone?Is there a draft party?
I couldn't find anything online, anyone?Is there a draft party?
id be out with out first 2nd and first next year if we could walk away with a top C like cozens
And you'd probably be every other GMs FAVORITE GM. By a country mile. Yep, you'd win all GM popularity contests.
Because everyone and their mother already knows that the 2020 draft is going to be one for the ages.
Other than Hughes and Kaako, it's not looking like any of this year's top 5-7 will be able to hold the jock straps of next year's top 5-7.
By the way, "id be out with out first 2nd and first next year..." is a real tough piece of poetry. Took a while to see what you were getting at.
I just think a top flight C prospect would do more for our teams future then whoever we get at 23 this year and whoever we get in the (hopefully) late 20's next yearAnd you'd probably be every other GMs FAVORITE GM. By a country mile. Yep, you'd win all GM popularity contests.
Because everyone and their mother already knows that the 2020 draft is going to be one for the ages.
Other than Hughes and Kaako, it's not looking like any of this year's top 5-7 will be able to hold the jock straps of next year's top 5-7.
By the way, "id be out with out first 2nd and first next year..." is a real tough piece of poetry. Took a while to see what you were getting at.
I'm feeling that Bobby Brink is going to be the guy that's left for us at #23. We OK with that?
His skating is very troubling to me. Like most criticized Iskhakov skating when he got drafted from what I have seen of Brink he’s a much worse skater then Iskhakov. His production and skill are impressive but I would be very leary of drafting Brink.Only saw him in U18. Little guy but was electric. I wish I saw more of him though. He’s consistently ranked asa first round talent though by many scouts.
If he’s deemed BPA so be it but for me he most likely wouldn’t be at that spot.
His skating is very troubling to me. Like most criticized Iskhakov skating when he got drafted from what I have seen of Brink he’s a much worse skater then Iskhakov. His production and skill are impressive but I would be very leary of drafting Brink.
I agree, BPA regardless of position, though I would love land a good young talented center. That being said, it would be pretty awesome if they walked away with Kaliyev or Harley.I am hoping at least one of Harley, Tomasino or Suzuki is there when the Isles draft at #23. Although if Kaliyev slides to the 15-20 range, maybe Lou makes the move up a few spots. But it should be fun and I hope the Isles go BPA, even if there is a dire need to restock at center. Hopefully a few teams reach for position need and a gem or two drops.
I agree, BPA regardless of position, though I would love land a good young talented center. That being said, it would be pretty awesome if they walked away with Kaliyev or Harley.
I saw a mock, before the Rangers traded #20, that had them landing Kakko at #2 and Kaliyev at #20, that would've been one sick haul.
One guy who might fall is Vasili Podkolzin, not to our range, but possibly out of the top 10.
One guy I would not mind is Hoglander. The Redline report called him the best skater in the draft with lots of skill. Watching his highlights he reminds me of Hagelin.You want your little guys to be tremendous skaters.
I didn’t see Cammaratta bad in Brink though.
To much money I got future considerations for 20 bucks. Pretty good details on the top 220 prospects.Scott, did you get the Black book this year?
To much money I got future considerations for 20 bucks. Pretty good details on the top 220 prospects.
One guy I would not mind is Hoglander. The Redline report called him the best skater in the draft with lots of skill. Watching his highlights he reminds me of Hagelin.
Ye i have read that as well but there is plenty of free info on the internet and other draft books out there that are much cheaper. I always get hockey news draft preview as well.I’ve never got either but they say Mark Edwards Black Book is really thorough and has a lot of material.
i don't know why people want to trade down and get extra 3rd and 4th rd picks, we don't need more middle of the road prospects we need more sure thing guys id much prefer a trade upI’m hoping for Harley, Suzuki or a trade back to acquire more mid round picks. Harley seems like a surefire top 4 guy imo and imagine our defensive core in 4 years when they all develop. I like Suzuki’s skating and think he’ll cap out as a middle six center. And I wouldn’t mind trading back because after the top 15 or 20 it’s very interchangeable. Also because we lack a 3rd and 4th.
Would you rather have a first and second or two seconds and one third in a draft where 20-50 are interchangeable. Plus to trade up you have to let go of an asset. I’d much rather trade down then up this year.i don't know why people want to trade down and get extra 3rd and 4th rd picks, we don't need more middle of the road prospects we need more sure thing guys id much prefer a trade up
Would you rather have a first and second or two seconds and one third in a draft where 20-50 are interchangeable. Plus to trade up you have to let go of an asset. I’d much rather trade down then up this year.
You into motorcycles or something?I’m hoping for Harley, Suzuki
Making the playoffs and winning a round will do that to ya.I'm actually surprised the Draft is this Friday. Kinda got caught off guard by that.